A feeling of strong devotion to one's country is called : nationalism
People with nationalism principle tend to be capable to do anything in order to bring benefit to their country, such as waging war, conquering more territory for the country, etc
hope this helps
Answer:
Most states require that all electoral votes go to the candidate who receives the most votes in that state. After state election officials certify the popular vote of each state, the winning slate of electors meet in the state capital and cast two ballots—one for Vice President and one for President. Electors cannot vote for a Presidential and Vice Presidential candidate who both hail from an elector’s home state. For instance, if both candidates come from New York, New York’s electors may vote for one of the candidates, but not both. In this hypothetical scenario, however, Delaware’s electors may vote for both New York candidates. This requirement is a holdover from early American history when one of the country’s major political fault lines divided big states from small states. The founders hoped this rule would prevent the largest states from dominating presidential elections.
Explanation:
Hope this helps if not sorry
The correct answer is A.
B is incorrect because this case does indeed make it to the Supreme Court in 1832.
C. is incorrect because this case was involving Cherokee land.
D. is incorrect because President Andrew Jackson disagreed with Supreme Court Justice Marshall's decision. He publicly changed him by stating that Marshall has made this law, let's see him try to enforce it.
This shows that letter A. is the only option that can be correct.
Answer:
Explanation:
Tenochtitlan was located on a swampy island in Lake Texcoco in what is today south central Mexico. The Aztecs were able to settle there because no one else wanted the land. At first, it wasn't a great place to start a city, but soon the Aztecs built up islands where they could grow crops. The water also worked as a natural defense against attacks from other cities.
It seems to me as if somewhere along the road, these Enlightenment ideas were in a way corrupted.<span> </span>The killing of the King is understandable because he is a symbol of the old way of government. Even killing the highest, most elite of the government was understandable. But killing every last government associate and even priests seems like a very noticeable turn from the traditional Enlightenment philosophies of Jean-Jacques and Voltaire.
