The s orbitals are not symmetrical in shape is a FALSE statement.
An s orbital is so symmetric, more specifically spherically symmetric that it looks the same from all directions.
- The atomic orbitals in the atoms of elements differ in shape.
In essence, the electrons they describe have varying probability distributions around the nucleus. The spherical symmetry of s orbitals is evident in the fact that all orbitals of a given shell in the hydrogen atom have the same energy.
- All s orbitals are spherically symmetrical. Put simply, an electron that occupies an s orbital can be found with the same probability at any orientation (at a distance) from the nucleus.
The s orbitals are therefore represented by a spherical boundary surface which is a surface which captures a high proportion of the electron density.
Read more:
brainly.com/question/5087295
Let's go through each of the answers and think about why they work or don't work.
Chemical forms compounds.
Nuclear changes the element completely. We're going to use the sun as an example. The sun is in a state of plasma. It's really hot and has all these particles hitting into each other. The nucleus' of atoms are hitting into each other forming larger elements. It's real crazy. Nuclear is not correct.
Physical cannot form a compound.
Answer:An atom
Explanation:
Because molecules more spread out and have things that connnect them and are not bunched up togoether
And Atoms are all packed up like in the picture
Hope this helps!:D
Answer:
It's False
Explanation:
In a chemical reaction, reactants that are not used up when the reaction is finished are called excess reagents. The reagent that is completely used up or reacted is called the limiting reagent, because its quantity limits the amount of products formed.
Hope this helps you
