The answer would be 400$. This is because 40 x 10 = 400.
Answer:
A) None
Step-by-step explanation:
1) 
shoudnt neccesarily be a factor of nst, for example, if s = 3, t = 4, and n = 12, then both s and t are factors of n, but 
is not a factor of nst = 144.
2) 
shoudnt neccesarily be a factor of nst. Let s be 4, let t be 6, and let n be 12. Then n is a factor of both s and t, but 
is not a factor of nst = 12*24. In fact, it is a greater number.
3) Again, s+t isnt necessarily a factor of nst, let s be 2 and t be 3. Then both s and t are factor of n = 12. However 5 = s+t is not a factor of nst = 72.
So, neither of the three options is guaranteed to be a factor of nst. In fact, for s = 4, t = 6, and n = 12, none of the three options are valid.
3x-r=-3r+rx
3x=-3r+r+rx
3x=-2r+rx
3=rx-2r/x
there you go buddy...gitty up
Answer:
yes
Step-by-step explanation:
sum:
• `x+y=6`
• `y=6-x`
Difference:
• `y-x=6`
• `y=x+6`
