Answer:
The height of water in the second tank is 2ft
Step-by-step explanation:
In this question, we are asked to calculate the height of water in a second tank if the content of a first tank is poured into the second tank.
The plot twist to answering this question is that we need to note the volume of water in the first tank. Although the first tank has dimensions of 2ft by 3ft by 2ft height, the water in the tank only rose to a height of 1 feet.
Hence, to calculate the volume of the water in the first tank, the width and the length of the tank still remain the same, the only difference here is that we work with a height of 1 feet since the Water is not full.
Mathematically, the volume of water present in the tank will be;
V = l * b * h
V = 4 * 3 * 1 = 12 cubic feet
Now, this content is emptied into a second tank. Since the volume of water here is the same; this means;
12 cubic feet = 3 * 2 * h
We ignore the 4ft height as it is just the height of the tank and not the height of the water in the tank
6h = 12 cubic feet
h = 12/6 = 2 ft
Answer:
A
Step-by-step explanation:
I am pretty sure this is right and I hope this helps
Answer:
Nonlinear
Step-by-step explanation:
This is nonlinear because its parent function is y =
. The parent function of a linear equation is y = x.
I hope this helps :))
Answer:
The correct options are;
B) The mean and median for the security company are both lower than the mean and the median for the collections performed by other companies
B) Since the security company appear to have collected lower revenue than other companies, there is some evidence of stealing by the security company's employees
Step-by-step explanation:
We use the acronym SC for the security company and OC for the other company
SC OC
1.6 1.5
1.8 2.1
1.6 1.9
1.8 2.2
1.7 1.9
1.2 1.7
1.1 2.1
1.2 2.2
1.2 2.2
1.5 1.8
∑x 14.7 19.6
The mean is given by ∑x/n
n = 10
SC OC
∴ Mean 1.47 1.96
The median is the
Hence
SC OC
Median 1.55 2
Therefore, the mean and median for the security company are both lower than the mean and the median for the collections performed by other companies.
b) Since the security company appear to have collected lower revenue than other companies, there is some evidence of stealing by the security company's employees.
Answer:
9-x
Step-by-step explanation: