Answer:
Individualism vs collectivism.
Explanation:
As the exercise presents, this theory has received the greatest attention in cross-cultural research. It has been used to both predict and explain many differences across cultures, especially in many aspects of thinking and emotions. The Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions Theory, briefly described, is used to compare differences in different cultures and countris, trying to determine what is different, what varies. The individualism vs collectivism considers the aspect of integration of groups into societies, where the individualism indicates personal goals, as it's name suggests, and collectivism indicates the importance of being in a group an it's well being.
A limited supply is something that is not unlimited; it cannot be replaced forever. for example, fossil fuels are a limited supply.
The answer to the given question about coping with a new baby is to remember that everybody goes through the same thing. is True
<h3>What is a Coping Mechanism?</h3>
This refers to the different ways people are able to cope with problems which may seem to overwhelm them so they can find some solace and extra motivation.
Hence, we can see that remembering that you are not alone in the situation would encourage a couple that the challenges of having a new baby is not strange and would help them cope better.
Read more about coping mechanism here;
brainly.com/question/15391126
Answer:
D. three-quarters
Explanation:
A. is not the right answer. It is too low.
B. is not the right answer. France is provided with more nuclear power.
C. is not the correct answer. This percent is too much.
<u> D. is the right answer. A total of 75% of France’s electrical power is provided by nuclear power, meaning three-quarters of the country. </u><u>France is one of the world’s biggest consumers of electricity,</u> which is why they set the goal to lower the consumption of nuclear energy by a quarter in the next 35 years.
The government may be violating the Fifth Amendment by trying to prosecute Mary and Bob again.
The Fifth Amendment states (among other things) that a person can be tried only once in federal court for the same offense. Given that Mary and Bob were already prosecuted for identity theft and won the case due to lack of evidence, the government can try to prosecute them again, but it will be violating the Fifth Amendment in doing so.