I believe the answer is: Deductive reasoning
In deductive reasoning, we would collect all the possible explanations of a certain occurrence and started to eliminate which one wouldn't fit to the fact at hand in order to form a certain conclusion. (just like what jason does in making his assumption)
Answer:
Franking Privilege.
Explanation:
The Franking Privilege, as the exercise details, refers to the privilege of certain government officials to send mail without payment or postage. Both personal and official designations are included in this privilege, for all members of Congress. The right to send mail to their constituents is called the Franking Privilege.
The correct answer is emphasizes similarities between all people
Distributionism is an example of an ethical, external point of view about language, providing its description with only a starting point. To choose between the multiple rules and classifications that are simultaneously admissible from the distributional point of view, it is necessary to add to this description an ethical study, which characterizes the units by the function that the speaking subject confers on them. Pragmatics is the discipline that studies the principles of language in use, in which the speaker, speaker and context are the main categories that determine linguistic interpretation. For pragmatics, the meaning of words is a function of the action or actions that are practiced or can be practiced with them, taking into account the way in which contextual factors determine linguistic performances in communication situations.
You have to look for the answer in the article you've read, it's the authors opinion of what new social network organization will replace
