Answer:
c. They are the same
Explanation:
I would say they are the same. It may be more difficult because if you start a protest, people might not support you because they don't want to get in trouble. If it was easier, you might have those types of schools where you start a protest and the big and bold people don't care what happens to them, which would help you with the protest. It actually all depends on who would actually want to help you whether they are your friends or not. It basically depends on what caused the protest.
Hope this helped!!!
The answer is "general intelligence (g) factor".
General intelligence, otherwise called as g factor, alludes to the presence of a wide mental limit that impacts execution on subjective capacity measures. Charles Spearman first depicted the presence of general intelligence in 1904. As indicated by Spearman, this g factor was in charge of general execution on mental capacity tests. Spearman noticed that while individuals unquestionably could and regularly excelled in specific zones, individuals who did well in one zone tended additionally to do well in different regions.
For instance, a man who does well on a verbal test would likely additionally do well on different tests.
Mainly this go under the science tab. Just to let you be aware.
Anyways, you change radiant energy into thermal energy. Since the rays warm up the food, which transfer the energy to it, causing it to heat up.
Hope this helps!
~GeeksandNerds
The correct answer is no.
Alisha was under no obligation to help Timmy, <em>there is no such thing like</em> <em>duty to rescue.</em> There is no legal requirement in the United States to help and rescue someone who is in danger. Even in extreme situation, when a person sees a person falling into a river for example, the witness of the situation is no obliged to assist with help.
There are some cases with some important exceptions: if the defendant created the peril he is obliged to come to the plaintiff's aid, if the defendant started to rescue the plaintiff, he must continue to do so, if the defendant is in a special relationship with the plaintiff ( teacher-student, worker-employer), he is under duty to rescue him.
Alisha was under no duty to inform Timmy's parents of the danger facing him <em>but she should have done it nevertheless.</em> She should at least have phoned them if she didn't have the time to stop by. She knew the boy well and she should have cared more. The need to help the boy should have come from her moral guidance and not as a sense of duty to be performed.
