1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ira [324]
3 years ago
12

which of the following explains one important reason behind Europeans' decision to rely on Africans, rather than American indige

nous peoples, for labor on American plantations?
History
2 answers:
Semmy [17]3 years ago
7 0
Typically, the main reason why the Europeans decided to rely on the Africans for labor on American plantations rather than on American indigenous people because Africans are longed been exposed to small pox and they have already developed immunity in most of the common European diseases.
Katen [24]3 years ago
4 0

You have not included "the following," but it is possible to answer this question by saying that Europeans relied primarily on Africans rather than on American indigenous peoples for labor because the former were significantly more resilient and immune to the microbes conveyed by the Europeans than the latter. It must be added, nevertheless, that the American Indians were also slaved in large numbers and sent to work in areas like the West Indies or Mexico.

You might be interested in
How did china's imperial bureaucracy/metricotcy lead to the decline of song?​
AlexFokin [52]
The Song Dynasty was so large and that was a factor in the empire's decline. They created so many positions within the bureaucracy and the men in those positions received a generous amount of money.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which amendment protects a citizen from unlawful searches and seizures
kondaur [170]

The Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution which is a part of Bill of Rights protects a citizen from unlawful searches and seizures.

It states that ' the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

The prime goal of the amendment is to protect individual's right to privacy and liberty from unreasonable intervention from the state.

8 0
3 years ago
What helps determine the bond amount or whether there is no bond?
Gnesinka [82]

Answer:

seriousness of the crime, this is not in the answer choices but they determine it off of if they think the defendant will do it again or flee before the trial

6 0
3 years ago
Great Britain and France avoided a take over by fascist by
maks197457 [2]

Answer:

Great Britain and France avoid a take over by fascists' by restricting freedom of speech.

Explanation:

Fascism is a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc. , and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism.  

How Britain and France avoided fascist revolution inside their own country during rise of fascism in Italy and Germany?

What made Mussolini’s Fascism, and Lenin’s Communism too, was a specific and unique situation, never to be repeated in later history: namely, the presence of enormous masses of disaffected veterans, with recent experience of war at a very high technical level of skill, and angry about the condition of their country. (And of enormous amounts of weapons.) Fascism was not made by speeches or by money, but by tens of thousands of men gathering in armed bands to beat up enemies. And that being the case, what happened to the similar masses of veterans who came home to France, Britain, and America too, after 1918?

Well, France was exhausted. She had fought with her full strength from day one, whereas Britain had taken time to deploy its whole strength, and America and Italy had only entered the war much later. For five years, every man who could be spared had been at the Front. Her losses were larger in proportion than those of any other great power. And on the positive side, France, like Britain and America, was prosperous. The veterans went home to a country that was comparatively able to receive them, give them a place to be, and not foster any dangerous mass disaffection. This is of course relatively speaking. There will have been anger enough, irritation enough, even some disaffection. But the only real case of violence from below due to disaffection was the riot in Paris that followed the Stavisky affair in early 1934, and that, compared to what took place daily in other countries, was a very bad play of a riot.

ON the other hand, both America and Britain experienced situations that had more than a taste of Fascism, but that failed to develop into freedom-destroying movements. In America, Fascism could have come from above. The last few years of the Wilson administration were horrendous: the Red Scare fanaticized large strata of the population, and the hatred came from the top, from Wilson and his terrible AG Palmer. (Palmer was a Quaker. So was Richard Nixon. Is there a reason why Quakers in politics should prove particularly dangerous?) Hate and fear of “reds” was also the driving force of Italian Fascism; and Wilson and Palmer mobilized it in ways and with goals that Mussolini would have understood. Had Wilson not suffered his famous collapse, he might have been a real danger: he intended to run for a third term in office. And the nationwide spread of the new KKK, well beyond the bounds of the old South, shows that he might have found a pool of willing stormtroopers. Altogether, I think America dodged a bullet the size of a Gatling shot when Wilson collapsed in office.

Britain’s own Blackshirt moment took place in Ireland. Sociologically, culturally, psychologically, the Blacks and Tans were the Blackshirts of Britain - masses of disaffected veterans sent into the streets to harass and terrify political enemies, bullies in non-standard uniforms with a loose relationship with the authorities. Only, their relationship with public opinion developed in an exactly opposite direction. Whereas Italy’s majority, horrified by Socialist violence at home and by Communist brutality abroad, tended increasingly to excuse the Blackshirts and wink at their violence, in Britain - possibly because of the influence of the American media, which were largely against British rule in Ireland - the paramilitary force found itself increasingly isolated from the country’s mainstream, and eventually their evil reputation became an asset to their own enemies and contributed to British acceptance of Irish independence.

Thanks,
Eddie

5 0
1 year ago
How did Andrew Camegie contribute to the industrial development of the United States?
Masja [62]

Answer:

His steel empire produced the raw materials that built the physical infrastructure of the United States. He was a catalyst in America's participation in the Industrial Revolution, as he produced the steel to make machinery and transportation possible throughout the nation

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • You help me out on the question you will get 10 brainlist so please help me
    10·2 answers
  • Which statement correctly describes a characteristic of Moche farmers
    15·1 answer
  • Why Didn't Carnegie not pay his workers more, even though he could?
    8·1 answer
  • Q 1 Describe the process scientists use when they study fossils include where fossils could be found and what steps scientists t
    6·1 answer
  • A system of government in which power is divided between a central authority and constituent political subunits is called_______
    9·1 answer
  • Select all that apply. From this lesson, which of the following were consequences of rapid population growth in the 20th century
    13·2 answers
  • What steps did pericles take to strengthen the empire and glorify athens
    8·1 answer
  • Cuando tienes que describir a Dios como lo describirias tu.
    9·1 answer
  • During the eighteenth century France witnessed the emergence of a middle class. Reason (R): The emergence of the middle class ha
    7·1 answer
  • What was life like in Stalin's Russia
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!