Answer:
The correct option is :
This stock is overvalued; you shouldn't consider adding it to your portfolio.
Explanation:
The stocks that are in cedar valley corporation has a price that exceedes its present value from this statement the first given option doesn't justify as the stocks rates are not undervalued.
Now, in the second option its again given that the stock will be overvalued which is true but it should be added to the portfolio is not correct. so, this option is not considered.
In the third option it mentions that stock is overvalued which is the correct option and also that it shouldn't be added in portfolio.
And the last one states that its undervalued which restricts the option at this point only.
So, third option is correct.
Answer: Please see the required journals below:
December 31:
Debit Bad debt expense $6,034
Credit Allowance for doubtful accounts $6,034
February 1:
Debit Allowance for doubtful accounts $431
Credit Accounts receivables $431
June 5:
Debit Cash $431
Credit Bad debt recovery (income statement) $431
Explanation: The company estimates its bad debt expense as percentage of sales. In this case 0.7% of its annual sales of $862,000 was deemed as uncollectible, that is, 0.7% x $862,000 = $6,034. The required journals to recognize this bad debt expense is provided above. However, since there was an existing provision, which resides in the allowance account, a write-off would definitely hit that account in order to extinguish the accounts receivable portion. Upon recovery of the write-off, we cannot reinstate the receivable since it was already extinguished but we need to recognize the recovery as a gain.
You can use hand cream or lotion so your hands don't become chapped or dry.
Answer:
Option B
Explanation:
In simple words, The given case is related to the conclusion made by the court in the famous case of Vokes versus Arthur MurrayLinks, in which the jury in the court rules that, a determination of a party carrying better information about a subject matter may be treated as a matter of fact even though it would be treated as an opinion if the parties were speaking for deal on equal conditions.
Marketing environmental forces are often interdependent.
