Solution :
2a + 2b = 7 ...1)
4a + 3b = 12 ...2)
In equation, 1)
a = (7 - 2b)/2 ...3)
Putting value of a in equation 2) we get :
4 × (7 - 2b)/2 + 3b = 12
2( 7 - 2b ) + 3b = 12
14 - 4b + 3b = 12
b = 2
Putting value of b in 3) we get :
a = ( 7 - 2×2)/2
a = 3/2 = 1.5
Now,
2x - 3y = 16 ...5)
x + 2y = -6 ...6)
x = -6 - 2y
Putting above value of x in eq 5) , we get :
2( -6 - 2y ) - 3y = 16
-12 - 4y - 3y = 16
7y = -28
y = -4
x = -6 - ( 2× -4 )
x = 2
Hence, this is the required solution.
Answer:
Choice A
Step-by-step explanation:
Use the F. O. L. D method while solving
Her estimate is not reasonable.
Since she estimated 69%, you could do either of these options. You could...
A. Divide 242 (or .5) to show how much half off would be, then compare her estimate with half of 242 (121). OR...
B. Simply divide 242 by 69% (.69) and compaor her estimate to the exact amount (166.98).
I hope this helps!
Answer:
three consecutive odd integers are.
Step-by-step explanation:
Let x be the first term of odd integer,
Therefore, the second consecutive odd integers = 
Similarly, the third consecutive odd integers = 
Given:
The sum of the first term and second term is 344.
first term + second term = 344
Here first term is x and second term is .
Therefore, the first odd integers is 171.
And the second consecutive odd integers = 
Similarly, the third consecutive odd integers = 
Answer:no
Step-by-step explanation: No, because all the ratios of y to x are not equal.
