Answer:
$57,000
Explanation:
<u><em>Step 1 : Depreciation Rate</em></u>
Depreciation Rate = (Cost - Residual Value) ÷ Estimated Production
therefore,
Depreciation Rate = $14.00 per machine hour
<u><em>Step 2 : Depreciation expenses</em></u>
Depreciation expense = Depreciation Rate x Annual production
therefore
Year 1 = $42,000
Year 2 = $56,000
Year 3 = $70,000
Total = $168,000
<em><u>Step 3 : Book Value</u></em>
Book Value = Cost - Accumulated Depreciation
= $225,000 - $168,000
= $57,000
Conclusion :
book value at the end of year 3 is $57,000
Answer:
A) Polonova has a strong sense of personal ambition and independence.
Explanation:
From the question we are informed Rainbow Corp. who hires a new secretary, Polonova, who differs from the vast majority of the company's employees in terms of her ethnicity. The company has a collectivist culture with a culturally diverse workforce and several policies to support the minorities. Yet, after a few weeks, she quits the company. In this case, she quit because Polonova has a strong sense of personal ambition and independence.
Personal Ambition can be regarded as strong desire as well as aspiration to work towards acheiving something or goals which requires alot of dedication and extra work. Personal independent also require the ability of someone to independently carry out some task productivity with freedom of choice in an organization.
It should be the price right?
The systematic response coefficient from inflation, would result in a change in any security return of <u>3.2 βI</u>.
<u>Explanation</u>:
<em><u>Given</u></em>:
Expected rate of inflation = 3%
Actual rate of inflation = 6.2%
The change in security return can be calculated by obtaining the differences between actual and expected levels of inflation.
Change in security return= Actual rate of inflation- Expected rate of inflation
= 6.2%-3%
= 3.2%
<u>Change in security return= 3.2 βI
</u>
<u></u>
Answer:
The correct answer is because it determines which contracts could be voidable
Explanation:
A unilateral mistake is when just one party to a contract is mistaken as to the terms contained in a contract.
Commonly, the unilateral mistake does not make a contract void; The mutual mistake makes it.
