Answer:
the United States Congress
Explanation:
Hope this helps :3
Answer:
a. the cost of reducing it's existing pollution by one unit.
Explanation:
Marginal cost refers to the addition to total cost when one more unit of output is produced. Marginal cost in the given case would refer to the additional cost incurred for reducing the current pollution level by one unit.
In the given case, a firm is charged $250 for each unit of pollution emitted under the pollution tax option.
It is also stated that all the firms experience increasing marginal costs of pollution reduction.
This means, as additional units of pollution are reduced, the additional costs would go on increasing.
If a firm finds that, reducing 1 unit of pollution from the current level costs it equal or more than $250, it will opt to pay $250 since, for each subsequent unit of pollution reduction, the additional costs would rise.
In conclusion, the coffee market is currently experiencing considerable growth in economies around the world, with the rise in urbanization and the demand for quick, quality product fueling the expansion. The market is expected to continue to inflate in the next five years, leaving ample room for returns and profit
Company A uses the FIFO method to account for inventory and Company B uses the LIFO method. The two companies are exactly alike except for the difference in inventory cost flow assumptions. The debt-to-equity ratio measures your company's total debt relative to the amount originally invested by the owners and the earnings that have been retained over time.
The debt to equity ratio using the book value of equity in 2019 would be 2.29.
Finding the debt-to-equity ratio.
This can be found by the formula:
= Interest bearing Debt / Book value of equity
= (Notes payable + Current maturities of long term debt + Long term debt) / Book value of equity
= (10.5 + 39.9 + 239.7) / 126.6
= 2.29
Learn more about debt-to-equity here
brainly.com/question/21408403
#SPj4
Answer:
C. Most people used the reply all button
Explanation:
This is a problem that can occur in companies due to misuse of e-mail functionalities. What happened in this case was that the employees who responded to the HR director's request email, used the reply button to all contacts forwarded in the director's original email, which ends up creating an email chain unnecessary and can hinder and delay the work of other employees, who need to see emails related to their role.
Therefore, the essential thing is that each employee makes use of the e-mail tool effectively, responding only to the recipient of the e-mail and avoiding sending unnecessary and private messages to contacts not interested in the professional subject addressed in the e-mail.
