Okay I think there has been a transcription issue here because it appears to me there are two answers. However I can spot where some brackets might be missing, bear with me on that.
A direct variation, a phrase I haven't heard before, sounds a lot like a direct proportion, something I am familiar with. A direct proportion satisfies two criteria:
The gradient of the function is constant s the independent variable (x) varies
The graph passes through the origin. That is to say when x = 0, y = 0.
Looking at these graphs, two can immediately be ruled out. Clearly A and D pass through the origin, and the gradient is constant because they are linear functions, so they are direct variations.
This leaves B and C. The graph of 1/x does not have a constant gradient, so any stretch of this graph (to y = k/x for some constant k) will similarly not be direct variation. Indeed there is a special name for this function, inverse proportion/variation. It appears both B and C are inverse proportion, however if I interpret B as y = (2/5)x instead, it is actually linear.
This leaves C as the odd one out.
I hope this helps you :)
19) 15 <= 9 + 3x
15) x = 23,24,25
17) x <= 115
9) Second line
11) g > 20, don't fill in dot, any number greater than 20
1) -3 + h<= 3.4
3) No, x > -2
5) x > 14, don't fill in dot, any number greater than 14
7) k<=20, fill in dot, 20 or any larger number
(took me while to type this out lol cause on mobile)
Answer:
Its the third answer
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
1499
5
(Decimal: 299.8)
Step-by-step explanation: =
300
1
−
20
100
=
300
1
+
−20
100
=
300
1
+
−1
5
=
1500
5
+
−1
5
=
1500+−1
5
Answer:
Linear inches
Step-by-step explanation:
or really, any linear dimension – simply refer to the sum total of your bag's length, width and depth.
