Answer:
1.71 kJ/mol
Explanation:
The expression for the calculation of the enthalpy change of a process is shown below as:-
Where,
is the enthalpy change
m is the mass
C is the specific heat capacity
is the temperature change
Thus, given that:-
Mass of CaO = 1.045 g
Specific heat = 4.18 J/g°C
So,
Also, 1 J = 0.001 kJ
So,
Also, Molar mass of CaO = 56.0774 g/mol
Thus, Enthalpy change in kJ/mol is:-
Answer:
Simply put, you can go from moles to grams and vice versa by using the mass of 1 mole of that substance, i.e its molar mass. For example, the molar mass of carbon is 12.011 g/mol. This means that 1 mole of carbon, or 6.022⋅1023 atoms of carbon, weigh 12.011 g.
Explanation:
The ions formed are NH4(+) and S(2-)
The dissolution reaction of (NH4) 2S in water is as follows:
(NH4) 2S ==> 2 NH4 (+) + S (2-).
Ammonium sulfide is the ammonium salt of hydrogen sulfide. It has the formula (NH4) 2S and belongs to the sulfide family.
It is a relatively unstable compound (crystals decomposing at -18 ° C, but exists and is more stable in aqueous solution.) With a pKa exceeding 15, the hydrosulfide ion cannot be significantly deprotonated by ammonia. Thus, such solutions consist mainly of a mixture of ammonia and hydrosulphide of ammonium, it has a smell, close to that of hydrogen sulfide, and its aqueous solutions can be precisely by emitting H2S.
Answer:
c. Compound 2 is more acidic because its conjugate base is more resonance stabilized
Explanation:
You haven't told us what the compounds are, so let's assume that the formula of Compound 1 is HCOCH₂OH and that of Compound 2 is CH₃COOH.
The conjugate base of 2 is CH₃COO⁻. It has two important resonance contributors, and the negative charge is evenly distributed between the two oxygen atoms.
CH₃COOH + H₂O ⇌ CH₃COO⁻ + H₃O⁺
The stabilization of the conjugate base pulls the position of equilibrium to the right, so the compound is more acidic than 1.
Answer:
An F1 offspring could produce four types of gametes, RY, Ry, rY, and ry. The F2 generation supports the independent-assortment model and refutes the linkage model.
Explanation:
