Answer:
The type of listening realized by Bob is:
- Active listening.
Explanation:
In the situation mentioned could apply two types of listening:
1. <em>Empathic listening:</em> Where the listener can put himself in someone else's shoes.
2. <em>Active listening:</em> Where the listener understand the meaning of the told and make feedback.
Despite the two options could be correct, in the empathic listening Bob just listen to the case, could put himself in the inmate's shoes but this doesn't benefit the inmate, instead, when Bob realizes the description of the empathic listening but also give a feedback about the listened and, possibly, an advice, <em>the inmate feels </em><u><em>supported</em></u>, how the paragraph mentions.
This is false. <u>The constant fear of failure is an element of negative thinking.
</u>
Negative thinking is connected to the energy field of each individual - that is, the greater the influence of the problem and the pain in your energy field, the stronger the bad thinking. If the person has an insecurity about an event and does not have a good susceptibility to frustration, negative thinking can take over the mind.
In this sense, the individual needs to understand the causes and reasons for this type of thinking in order to find solutions aimed at reducing them and replacing these thoughts with more positive thoughts. Another important action would be the search for solutions to negative thoughts, that is, trying to mobilize to solve these issues that cause suffering.
<span>According to Latané and Darley (1968), you will first experience the bystander effect to offer assistance in an emergency. This effect will only happen if the presence of that person is not needed making them feel discouraged to hep further especially if he or she could not help in an emergency situation. The main cause is that there is a clear division of responsibility and social influence.</span>
Roediger and Mcdermott performed an experiment with over 60 test subjects that were exposed in different stimuli. In their experiment they concluded that there must have been a trade-off of between the false memory susceptibility and categorization ability and that the superior performance on one will relate to having superior performance to the other.
