Answer:
C) Arousal
Explanation:
Arousal theory of motivation: The arousal theory of motivation was influenced by the work of John Dillingham Dodson and Robert M. Yerkes during 1908.
In psychology, the arousal theory of motivation is described as explaining that every individual or person has a distinct level of arousal that he or she believes to be perfect for him or her. According to this theory, an individual seeks his or her stimulation to maintain an optimal arousal level.
In the question above, the given statement is a proponent of the arousal theory of motivation.
The first colonist that came to GA was britain with their 21 trustees they wanted GA fro three reasons defense,economy and charity
Answer: Because Canada is constitutional monarchy
Explanation:
Since Canada is a constitutional monarchy, every act of the government in Canada is considering consulting in the name of the Crown but for those situations and acts the peoples' authority is the one who is obligated and taking into consideration. Canada's executive authority is assigned by the Constitution.
4. Add encouraging words while giving feedback.
* This is a good practice in terms of feedback. It is good to highlight strengths as you point out areas of improvement. Through encouragement, they are able to feel that improvement is a possibility for them.
For number 1, when offering criticism, you are not looking for an apology. you are looking to encourage improvement.
As for number 2, although it is good to make things clear, workers or people typically respond better to rewards rather than punishment.
Number 3, is not a good practice because constructive criticism should be done privately and not in a group setting. It may make the receiver feel like they are being singled-out.
Number 5, the point of criticism is to point out areas of improvement and at the same time, show or give examples as to how they can improve. Giving solutions and ideas during feedback will help the receiver understand what they did wrong and how they were supposed to do it.
The state legislature could have refused to implement the decision, leading to a crisis in the legitimacy of the Supreme Court's authority.
Baker v. Carr (1962) is the U.S. Preferred court docket case that held that federal courts should hear cases alleging that a state's drawing of electoral obstacles, i.E. Redistricting, violates the identical safety Clause of the Fourteenth modification of the charter.
Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962), became a landmark USA ideal court docket case in which the court held that redistricting qualifies as a justiciable question beneath the Fourteenth Amendment, therefore enabling federal courts to hear Fourteenth amendment-based totally redistricting instances.
Learn more about legislature here brainly.com/question/809346
#SPJ4
