Answer:
The depreciation expense for 2015 is $2,000
Explanation:
The computation of the depreciation expense is shown below:
= (Original cost - residual value) ÷ useful life
= ($35,500 - $4,000) ÷ 7 years
= 4,500
The depreciation for three years would be
= 4,500 × 3 years
= $13,500
The remaining amount would be
= $35,500 - $13,500
= $22,000
So, the depreciation expense for 2015 would be
= ($22,000 - $4,000) ÷ 9 years
= 2,000
Answer:
Increase in income= $2,965.6
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Gruden Company produces golf discs which it normally sells to retailers for $7 each. The cost of manufacturing 23,600 golf discs is:
Materials $ 12,036
Labor 35,400
Variable overhead 23,128
Fixed overhead 47,200
Total $117,764
McGee Corporation offers Gruden $4.91 per disc for 4,930 discs. If Gruden accepts the offer, its fixed overhead will increase from $47,200 to $53,700 due to the purchase of a new imprinting machine.
Total variable cost= (12,036 + 35,400 + 23,128)= 70,564
Unitary variable cost= 70,564/23,600= $2.99
Increase in fixed costs= $6,500
Increase in income= (4930*4.91) - (4930*2.99) - 6500= $2,965.6
Answer:
$55,000
Explanation:
A Simplified Employee Pension (SEP) Plan is used in the United States by employers or self-employed persons to provide retirement benefits for themselves and their employees
As stated by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), the contributions that can be made to each employee’s SEP-IRA each year is which one is lower between 25% of compensation and the maximum of $55,000 for 2018.
We can then calculate as follow:
1. Jerry's contribution calculation = 25% × $187,600 = 46,900.
2. Maximum allowable = $55,000.
Since a defined contribution plan states that Jerry will contribute the maximum amount allowable and the maximum for 2018 is $55,000, Jerry's contribution will therefore be $55,000.
Answer:
A Subjective performance evaluation is more feasible when evaluating jobs that cannot easily be evaluated by numbers, in finding problems such as ethical errors that objective evaluation cannot identify and in identifying the rate of achievement of work goals that cannot be recorded in an objective evaluation.
Explanation:
Though Objective evaluation has been the more favored form of evaluation for valid reasons, there are still situations where subjective performance evaluation does a better job in the workplace.
Some jobs for example, the job of an attorney, cannot easily be objectively evaluated. In this situation, it falls on the employer to evaluate the performance of the employee by using measurements like team play, professionalism and client service.
In objective analysis, some ethical approaches are overlooked and the achievement of the set goal is the major criterion for ratings. This affords employees the opportunity to use unethical means to achieve set targets and the objective performance evaluation skips it, leaving them safe and with high ratings. In subjective performance ratings however, the employer having the power to rate employers, could expose these unethical behaviors faster and actions, taken on them.
In the workplace, certain goals are set in overall goals, as a method to achieving the overall set target. In an objective performance rating, an employee could bypass these and still appear to have achieved the overall goal. An objective evaluation will miss this but a subjective evaluation could pick this out and make rating each employee based on these soft goals and overall goal achievable.
Answer:
February 125 call
Explanation:
Because, the expression "in the money" means to a situation when the market price of the asset is higher than the strike price for a call or lower than the strike price for a put. The correct answer is the only option that reach this feature
