Social limitations
African discriminated for everything. They are not allowed to enter specific restaurants, they are forbidden to use public restroom, not allowed to enter theatre, etc
Political Limitations
Back then, their representative in the government is close to non existent
Economic limitations
Most companies only want to hire them for low-class hard labor with low pay. Not only that, it really hard for them to own a property during that period
hope this helps
<span>The correct answer is A. Both exercised military and economic domination over colonial territories.
Both French and British practised similar tactics to control and domination over their empires in Asia to profit economically and militarily from their colonies. Economically the French did well in Fur Trade while the British sold products to their colonies and acquired raw materials for their industries, getting products from their farms.
Both countries also used their colonial territories in Asia to serve as military bases when necessary.</span>
Because they are speacil people ok ≠
The correct answer is that what led the Soviet Union to establish the Warsaw Pact was that West Germany joined NATO in 1955.
The Treaty of Friendship, Cooperation and Mutual Assistance, better known as the Warsaw Pact, was a military cooperation agreement signed on May 14, 1955 by the countries of the Eastern Bloc. Designed under the leadership of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), its express purpose was to counteract the threat of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), and in particular the rearmament of the German Federal Republic, to which the Paris Agreements allowed to reorganize their armed forces and join the NATO. The Pact was dissolved on July 1, 1991.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
During the times of NAFTA, the North America Free Trade Agreement between México, Canada, and the United States, many people opposed the treaty and questioned President Bill Clinton about it.
Nader and Buchanan opposed the ratification of NAFTA. This influenced what Clinton said in his speech of September 14, 1993. On that day, President Clinton signed two supplements that were included in the Free Trade Agreement.
President Clinton’s speech addressed the arguments against NAFTA that Nader and Buchanan made in that hehe said it was not true that the trade meant just moving out jobs from the US to México. And he clearly explained that Mexicans with lower income than Germans or Europeans spent more in US products, more than those Europeans and Canadians.
