Answer:
Eva would have been better off selecting the 20-year term policy.
Step-by-step explanation:
Base on the scenario been described in the question, Eva would have been better off selecting the 20-year term policy. This reason is because assuming Eva bought the 20-year term policy, she wont be paying the new charge of extra 40% to her premium rate, compared to when she bought the 10-year term policy then renew the policy for another ten years.
Answer:
Take a look at the 'proof' below
Step-by-step explanation:
The graph of the function g(x) is similar to that of the function f(t). The local minimum, local maximum, absolute minimum, maximum etc... of 'x' is always the closest x-intercept of the graph of f(t).
Let's check if this statement is right. The two local minimum(s) of the function f(t) occurs at x = 2, and x = 6. The two local maximum(s) occur at 1/4 and 4. As you can see the maximum / minimum of the function g(x) is always an x-intercept, x = 3, x = 7.
For part (b) the absolute maximum value of the function f(t), is 8. The closest x-intercept is 9, which is our solution.
Answer:
64
Step-by-step explanation:
first, we'll start with the value inside the parenthesis, which is 2³
2³ means to multiply 2 by itself 3 times
so it would be
2×2×2=8
which then means that the expression is now (8)²
now we need to do (8)², which is to multiply 8 by itself twice
8*8=64
hope this helps!
B inventory
Add purchase
Add fright inward
Total amount to be account for
Less E inventory
Step-by-step explanation:
