Answer:
<u><em>Yes.</em></u>
Step-by-step explanation:
<em>To find the answer we will put it into the equation, since</em><em><u> x = 1 and y = 2</u></em><em> we will write it like this, </em><u><em>6(1) - 2 > 3.</em></u><em> Since </em><u><em>6 x 1 = 6</em></u><em>, we will now </em><u><em>subtract 6 from 2 which equals 4</em></u><em>. Therefore, the equation is </em><u><em>correct because 4 is bigger than 3.</em></u>
The angle is going to be a 65° angle
Hey, do you need to simplify all of them?
Splitting up the interval of integration into
subintervals gives the partition
![\left[0,\dfrac1n\right],\left[\dfrac1n,\dfrac2n\right],\ldots,\left[\dfrac{n-1}n,1\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B0%2C%5Cdfrac1n%5Cright%5D%2C%5Cleft%5B%5Cdfrac1n%2C%5Cdfrac2n%5Cright%5D%2C%5Cldots%2C%5Cleft%5B%5Cdfrac%7Bn-1%7Dn%2C1%5Cright%5D)
Each subinterval has length
. The right endpoints of each subinterval follow the sequence

with
. Then the left-endpoint Riemann sum that approximates the definite integral is

and taking the limit as
gives the area exactly. We have

Answer:
point of intercept
Step-by-step explanation:
measure x and y axis to see where they cross