Historic revisionism includes revisiting the sources of a historic document or length with a unique attitude or new information that would adjust how we see it.
<h3>
What is Historical revisionism?</h3>
Historical revisionism is the method via way of means of which the ancient record, the records of the society, as understood in its collective memory, constantly accounts for new information and interpretations of the activities which might be usually understood as records.
This manner of revisiting records has both advantageous and negative aspects.
Hence, Historic revisionism includes revisiting the sources of a historic document or length with a unique attitude or new information that would adjust how we see it.
learn more about Historic revisionism here:
brainly.com/question/8862527
#SPJ1
Answer:
1. The author uses the words "undefined", "unbounded" and "immense" to describe the powers of the constitution.
2. Upset: it makes the Congress even more powerful than it’s previous long list of expressed powers
3. A Bill of Rights is necessary to protect the rights of citizens. The proposed Constitution does not do enough.
4. Yes he does, and it matters because if you don’t trust the people in power you wouldn’t have a real nation.
5.He seems more like an Anti-Federalist.
Part Two
1. Unnecessary and dangerous
2. From the Federalist No.84
3. No because he believes that its unnecessary and not needed in the constitution.
4. That the bill of rights is pointless and not realistic for the American people.
5 He is defiantly Anti-Federalist; He goes against everything Federalism is for.
60 to get thereyou multiply the three numbers together
What time period are we talking about here?
Answer:
Please provide more information about your question. If this is an answer to someone else's question, please post it in the answer to their problem.
