Do you want the catholic answer or do you just want a general answer, because it could be an opinion.
Effects that scientists had predicted in the past would result from global climate change are now occurring: loss of sea ice, accelerated sea level rise and longer, more intense heat waves.
Famine- High population means more mouths to feed
Disease- Diseases usually spread more quickly with people who live closer( as it can just move from one person to the other)
War- People like to fight for land, resources, money, etc. And having more of those things mean they are more able to support families, communities, and more.
(Hope this helps a little)
The environmental lesson that you can derive from the ecocide hypothesis for what happened to Easter Island is that D. climate changes have environmental consequences for all inhabitants of an environment.
I think the answer its A because a Punnett square allows the prediction of the percentages of phenotypes in the offspring of a cross from known genotypes. A Punnett square can be used to determine a missing genotype based on the other genotypes involved in a cross.
