Answer:
1.It Doesn’t Account for Discouraged Workers
2. It Ignores Other Marginally Attached Workers
3. It Doesn’t Separate Part-Time and Full-Time Workers
4. It Doesn’t Consider Whether People Have Low-Paying Jobs
5. It Doesn’t Capture the Long-Term Unemployment Rate
Explanation:
Answer:
The answer would be A
Explanation:
States can make laws limiting these freedoms.
Answer:
supreme court I'm pretty sure if not let me know and I'll find out
Answer:
Women's rights have historically been restricted by the Supreme Court using the reasonableness standard.
Explanation:
The reasonableness standard is used in US courts to understand whether a plaintiff or defendant acted reasonably in a harassment situation, for example, and it has been used in cases against police where the plaintiff claims excessive violence was used. There is also the "reasonable woman standard" that has been used in US Supreme Court Cases like Harris vs. Forklift Systems 510 US 17 (1993). The Supreme Court sided in favor of Harris who had to appeal two lower court decisions that found that Harris was not sufficiently psychologically impacted for the case to constitute harassment. The reasonableness standard can be seen as limiting because it imposes the standards of what men find reasonable in a sexual situation and coworker relationship at the expense of what women may find uncomfortable or inappropriate.
