Answer:
I am grade 5 and I don't know about what it is at all. but please make me as the brainliest
Answer:
I dont know I also need help with this
Step-by-step explanation:
this is so hard please help
Answer:A
Step-by-step explanation:
X=2(y+1)^2-6
Answer:
The angular velocity is 6.72 π radians per second
Step-by-step explanation:
The formula of the angular velocity is ω =
, where v is the linear velocity and r is the radius of the circle
The unit of the angular velocity is radians per second
∵ The diameter of the tire is 25 inches
∵ The linear velocity is 15 miles per hour
- We must change the mile to inch and the hour to seconds
∵ 1 mile = 63360 inches
∵ 1 hour = 3600 second
∴ 15 miles/hour = 15 × 
∴ 15 miles/hour = 264 inches per second
Now let us find the angular velocity
∵ ω =
∵ v = 264 in./sec.
∵ d = 25 in.
- The radius is one-half the diameter
∴ r =
× 25 = 12.5 in.
- Substitute the values of v and r in the formula above to find ω
∴ ω = 
∴ ω = 21.12 rad./sec.
- Divide it by π to give the answer in terms of π
∴ ω = 6.72 π radians per second
The angular velocity is 6.72 π radians per second
Answer:
a) H0:
H1:
b) 
And the critical values with
on each tail are:

c)
d) For this case since the critical value is not higher or lower than the critical values we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true deviation is not significantly different from 1.34
Step-by-step explanation:
Information provided
n = 10 sample size
s= 1.186 the sample deviation
the value that we want to test
represent the p value for the test
t represent the statistic (chi square test)
significance level
Part a
On this case we want to test if the true deviation is 1,34 or no, so the system of hypothesis are:
H0:
H1:
The statistic is given by:
Part b
The degrees of freedom are given by:

And the critical values with
on each tail are:

Part c
Replacing the info we got:
Part d
For this case since the critical value is not higher or lower than the critical values we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true deviation is not significantly different from 1.34