Answer:
2) perfectly vertical
Explanation:
When the price elasticity of demand is perfectly inelastic, the demand curve is perfectly vertical. This means that the quantity demanded will remain the same no matter what price.
In this scenario, the supply curve for oranges shifted to the left due to the early freeze, which results in a price increase at every level of quantity demanded. Since the demand is perfectly inelastic, the new equilibrium price will be determined by the how much the supply curve shifts.
Answer:
The answer is D) None of these statement is relevant in the decision to further process the cream into butter.
Explanation:
option A) the amount paid to the farmers to purchase the unprocessed milk: this information is not relevant to further develop the cream and low fat milk to butter. It was already considered before this stage of production.
Option B) the cost of breaking down the unprocessed milk into cream and low-fat milk: this cost was already accounted for since the processing into cream and low fat milk is completed.
Option C) the portion of corporate fixed expenses that are currently being allocated to cream: This information is not going to help in the decision making for further processing.
Trade surplus or positive trade balance.
Both of these terms refer to the situation of higher exports than imports.
The correct option is: For each unit of the good that is sold, buyers bear <u>one-half of the tax burden and sellers bear one-half of the tax burden.</u>
<u>Explanation</u>:
Incidence of tax is a term referred in economics which deals with division of taxes. Tax incidence refers to division of tax among the buyer and seller for a product. The tax incidence is related to the price elasticity of supply and demand.
When a product is sold, the buyer of the product is charged with one-half of the tax burden and the seller of the product bears the other-half of the tax burden.
The incidence of tax can be observed in two ways:
i) Formal incidence
ii) Effective incidence
The proposed response of Adam Smith based on each scenario is given below:
<h3>Scenario 1</h3>
He would say that the pricing system should remain the main determinant of the market and the interference of the government was uncalled for.
<h3>Scenario 2</h3>
He would side with the free market system and be an opponent of the law that frowns on importation.
<h3>Scenario 3</h3>
He would support the suspension of the antitrust laws.
<h3>Scenario 4</h3>
He would believe that markets should not be regulated and the free market system should continue.
<h3>Who is Adam Smith?</h3>
He is the father of modern economics for his work in pioneering ideas such as free trade and the gross domestic product
Hence, we can see that the proposed response of Adam Smith based on each scenario is given above.
Read more about Adam Smith here:
brainly.com/question/50
#SPJ1