1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Rus_ich [418]
2 years ago
7

Freire’s notion of praxis

Law
1 answer:
aivan3 [116]2 years ago
7 0

Paulo Freire defines praxis in Pedagogy of the Oppressed as "reflection and action directed at the structures to be transformed." Through praxis, oppressed people can acquire a critical awareness of their own condition, and, with teacher-students and students-teachers, struggle for liberation
You might be interested in
Do you agree or disagree with the supreme court’s majority ruling in yarborough v.Alvarado? Write a short paragraph describing y
goblinko [34]
Okkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Rawls might criticize Locke’s social contract on which of the following grounds?
artcher [175]

Answer:

a) The parties to the contract know too much about their particular interests and as a result, the terms of the contract are not necessarily fair.

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
In trial for homicide, a conviction cannot be had the body of the victim has been found.
stellarik [79]

Answer:

If this is a true or false question then the answer is false

there are many ways a trial can still be had; here is one example...

Explanation:

A murder conviction without a body is an instance of a person being convicted of murder despite the absence of the victim's body. Circumstantial and forensic evidence are prominent in such convictions. ... In all cases, unless otherwise noted, the remains of the victims were never recovered.

hope this helps :)

may I get brainliest please?

3 0
3 years ago
In which federal court district is Indianapolis in
Vitek1552 [10]
Birch Bayh Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse (Indianapolis)
4 0
3 years ago
In which case did the Supreme Court state that a seizure has occurred if the officer's conduct in conjunction with the questioni
german

Answer:

terry v. ohio

Explanation:

Terry v. Ohio, in 1968, was a major decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment's prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures is not in violation when a police officer stops a suspect on the street and frisks him or her without probable cause to arrest, if the police officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime and has a reasonable belief that the person "may be armed and presently dangerous."

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Argue for or against the author's claim that "it is every eligible American citizen's civic responsibility to vote." Support you
    15·1 answer
  • One of the mistakes that was made in both the JonBenet Ramsey and Lizzie Borden cases was:
    5·1 answer
  • What is the difference between public forum and private property?
    6·1 answer
  • What would happen if you fake a credit card number online on a website.
    11·1 answer
  • Who is currently the president?
    10·2 answers
  • 7. Section of the brief where the issues are analyzed through citation of<br> legal authorities?
    15·1 answer
  • Reflect on the types of evidence you expect to be found and collected from the Willow Lane crime scene, and make a list of the t
    14·1 answer
  • Essential Questions: How do interest groups/lobbyists support the legislative process? Does the role that interest groups play r
    9·1 answer
  • The principles evolved by the courts in England in interpreting statutes are adopted and applied with local
    15·1 answer
  • What preconviction process benefits the defense by avoiding the risk of a harsher punishment and benefits the prosecution by avo
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!