1) Lets say the perpetrators were not smart about it and didn’t wear gloves when entering the home, if they touched anything they didn’t take and/or later their hand on anything in the house you could find finger prints and have them traced back to them if they are in the system.
2) Depending on how the perpetrators drove away, you can trace the tire tracks, if they left any, back to the tire of the car that was used. But lets say the car was stolen or unregistered, that would make it a little harder to trace the car back to the perpetrators that used it.
3) Perpetrators could have left many things. Used gloves, personal items (phones, laptops, watches etc. etc.) or anything the perpetrators may have touched/used. If they weren’t wearing gloves, they would of left finger prints on anything they touched therefore, you could link them to the crime. Unless they aren’t in the system.
Hope I understood your question and that my answer helped you!
Answer:
Option D, all of the above.
All of the options are forms of analyzing evidence.
Criminal Profiling is a legitimate law enforcement technique that uses knowledge, training, and experience to narrow a field of suspects during a criminal investigation. Factual information, patterns of activity, and motives are some of the aspects considered when using criminal profiling to identify a suspect
Answer:
Commander in chief and head of the judicial branch
Explanation:
Answer: Common law governs contractual transactions with real estate, services, insurance, intangible assets and employment. UCC governs contractual transaction with goods and tangible objects (such as a purchase of a car).
Explanation:
