1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Jlenok [28]
3 years ago
7

What is -3/4 – (-1/2)? A. -5/4 B. -1/4 C. 1/4 D. 1/2

Mathematics
2 answers:
Delicious77 [7]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

B. -1/4

Step-by-step explanation:

goldfiish [28.3K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

-1/4

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in
One third of eleven sixteenths
Sloan [31]
<span>16 <span>38</span> - 9 <span>58</span> = <span>274</span> = 6<span>34</span> = 6.75</span>
6 0
4 years ago
How much will 27 copies cost if it cost $4.50 to make 150 copies?<br><br>use cross multiplication
Mamont248 [21]
Hey there!

To start, first set up a proportion where x is the cost to make 27 copies:
27/x=150/4.50

Now, solve for x by cross multiplying which should look like this:
27*4.50=x*150

Now simplify and solve for x:
121.5=150x
x=0.81

Therefore, it costs $0.81 to make 27 copies.

Hope this helps!
4 0
3 years ago
Which is the quadratic variation equation for the relationship?
Ksivusya [100]
y=kx^2 \\ \\&#10;y=36 \hbox{ when } x=3 \\&#10;36=k \times 3^2 \\&#10;36=k \times 9 \\&#10;k=4 \\ \\&#10;\boxed{y=4x^2} \Leftarrow \hbox{answer B}
3 0
3 years ago
Which expressions are equivalent to -2.3 - 8.7 + (-5). Select all that apply?
Paraphin [41]

Answer:

b and e are equivalent to. -2.3 - 8.7 +(-5)

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Salk polio vaccine experiment in 1954 focused on the effectiveness of the vaccine in combating paralytic polio. Because it w
sdas [7]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Hello!

The variables of interest are:

X₁: Number of cases of polio observed in kids that received the placebo vaccine.

n₁= 201299 total children studied

x₁= 110 cases observed

X₂: Number of cases of polio observed in kids that received the experimental vaccine.

n₂= 200745 total children studied

x₂= 33 cases observed

These two variables have a binomial distribution. The parameters of interest, the ones to compare, are the population proportions: p₁ vs p₂

You have to test if the population proportions of children who contracted polio in both groups are different: p₂ ≠ p₁

a)

H₀: p₂ = p₁

H₁: p₂ ≠ p₁

α: 0.05

Z= \frac{(p'_2-p'_1)-(p_2-p_1)}{\sqrt{p'[\frac{1}{n_1} +\frac{1}{n_2} ]} }

Sample proportion placebo p'₁= x₁/n₁= 110/201299= 0.0005

Sample proportion vaccine p'₂= x₂/n₂= 33/200745= 0.0002

Pooled sample proportion p'= (x₁+x₂)/(n₁+n₂)= (110+33)/(201299+200745)= 0.0004

Z_{H_0}= \frac{(0.0002-0.0005)-0}{\sqrt{0.0004[\frac{1}{201299} +\frac{1}{200745} ]} }= -4.76

This test is two-tailed, using the critical value approach, you have to determine two critical values:

Z_{\alpha/2}= Z_{0.025}= -1.96

Z_{1-\alpha /2}= Z_{0.975}= 1.96

Then if Z_{H_0} ≤ -1.96 or if Z_{H_0} ≥ 1.96, the decision is to reject the null hypothesis.

If -1.96 < Z_{H_0} < 1.96, the decision is to not reject the null hypothesis.

⇒ Z_{H_0}= -4.76, the decision is to reject the null hypothesis.

b)

H₀: p₂ = p₁

H₁: p₂ ≠ p₁

α: 0.01

Z= \frac{(p'_2-p'_1)-(p_2-p_1)}{\sqrt{p'[\frac{1}{n_1} +\frac{1}{n_2} ]} }

The value of Z_{H_0}= -4.76 doesn't change, since we are working with the same samples.

The only thing that changes alongside with the level of significance is the rejection region:

Z_{\alpha /2}= Z_{0.005}= -2.576

Z_{1-\alpha /2}= Z_{0.995}= 2.576

Then if Z_{H_0} ≤ -2.576or if Z_{H_0} ≥ 2.576, the decision is to reject the null hypothesis.

If -2.576< Z_{H_0} < 2.576, the decision is to not reject the null hypothesis.

⇒ Z_{H_0}= -4.76, the decision is to reject the null hypothesis.

c)

Remember the level of significance (probability of committing type I error) is the probability of rejecting a true null hypothesis. This means that the smaller this value is, the fewer chances you have of discarding the true null hypothesis. But as you know, you cannot just reduce this value to zero because, the smaller α is, the bigger β (probability of committing type II error) becomes.

Rejecting the null hypothesis using different values of α means that there is a high chance that you reached a correct decision (rejecting a false null hypothesis)

I hope this helps!

8 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Pensé dos números. Si los sumo obtengo 20. Si al doble del primer número le sumo 35 obtengo el segundo. ¿ qué número pensé?
    10·1 answer
  • Sam correctly answered 80% of the questions on his last math test if he missed 3 problems how many questions were on the test
    6·1 answer
  • How do you draw a two dimensional shape that has four angles in all show a picture
    9·1 answer
  • Keith plans to buy a car in the future. He currently has $3,000 saved up to buy the car. How much money (x) does he need to save
    11·1 answer
  • The graph of a linear function F is given
    14·1 answer
  • 13. Using the information from the previous problem, calculate the amount of
    7·1 answer
  • Y=-9x<br><br>Y=7x+128<br><br>In subsition form
    12·1 answer
  • What is the answer for 10x + 35
    8·2 answers
  • If i only do 8/9 assignments what will my grade be if it was 100%
    10·2 answers
  • 1. An iPhone is on sale for $780. It originally cost $1000.00. What is the percent of change?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!