Answer:
The upheaval was caused by widespread discontent with the French monarchy and the poor economic policies of King Louis XVI
Explanation:
Answer:
To avoid the ethical issues a true experiment would cause.
Explanation:
A quasi-experiment is a factual conventional study that is used to calculate the causal effect of interference on a target population without an irregular function. Quasi-experimental research shares closeness with traditional experimental design or randomized controlled trials, but lacks the element of random assignment specifically for treatment or control.
Instead, quasi-experimental designs typically allow the researcher to control the assignment to treatment status, but use some criterion other than random assignment (For example- an eligibility cutoff mark).
It follow the format known as: <span>symposium-forum.
</span><span>In symposium-forum format, we can expect to see a chairperson that accompanied by several presenters (in most events it would be around three or four)
</span>This format is most commonly used in event that provide experts with an opportunity to propose their theory, findings, or their opinions regarding other experts' works.
The correct answer would be, The Power Elite.
Mills wrote: 'the power to make decisions of national and international consequences is now so clearly seated in political, military and economic institutions that other areas of society seem off to the side'. Mills was writing about The Power Elite.
Explanation:
C. Wright Mills was a Conflict Theorist. He wrote a book named The Power Elite, in 1956. In this book he wrote clearly about the interwoven interests of leaders. These leaders are from different big institutions other than the ordinary citizens.
These leaders are from the Military, Corporate and Political elements of the society. The ordinary citizen seems to have no power at all. All decisions are already made and dictated by the leaders of the society. The citizens are relatively powerless subject of manipulation.
Learn more about The Power Elite at:
brainly.com/question/12793435
#LearnWithBrainly
Answer:
His own
Explanation:
As John develops the agenda, he wants to put the name of the appropriate person next to the agenda item. Whose name would he put next to the final task on the agenda, the task of documenting the results of the JAD session and preparing the report that will be sent to JAD team members?
a. Clark
b. Tom
c. Linda
d. His own
JAD session
Instead of a single one-on-one interview, analysts often use joint-application design sessions to gather data and information. Joint-application design (JAD) sessions are a series of lengthy, structured, group meetings in which users and IT professionals work together to design or develop an application.
John would put his name since he is the one thst developed the agenda and did all the documentation.
