Responder:
1/12
Explicación paso a paso:
Entonces multiplicamos 9 por 3 y obtenemos 27.
Luego multiplicamos 2 por 12 y obtenemos 24.
A continuación, le damos a ambos términos nuevos denominadores: 12 × 3 = 36.
Así que ahora nuestras fracciones se ven así:
27
36
-
24
36
Paso 2
Dado que nuestros denominadores coinciden, podemos restar los numeradores.
27 - 24 = 3
Entonces la respuesta es:
3
36
Paso 3
Por último, necesitamos simplificar la fracción, si es posible. ¿Se puede reducir a una fracción más simple?
Para averiguarlo, intentamos dividirlo por 2 ...
¡No! Así que ahora probamos con el siguiente número primo mayor, 3 ...
¿Son tanto el numerador como el denominador divisibles por 3? ¡Sí! Entonces lo reducimos:
3
36
÷ 3 =
<u>1/12 </u>
X=4. 4/2=2 and 8/4=2 making the equations equal
There's a key problem in this question compelling you to actually rewrite it like that! Mathematically that is inaccurate and incorrect. If you do 72(8+19) it seems as if you are going to do 8+19*72 as in algebra whatever is outside the bracket is bound to go multiplied so technically (8+19)+72 would make more sense and the answer is
Using bidmas do the brackets first
8+19= 27
27+72=99
Answer:
The distance between these two given points is:
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given two points:
(-3,7),(0,4)
<em>The distance between two points (a,b) and (c,d) is given by the distance formula as:</em>
<em>
</em>
similarly we can find the length of a line segment by considering the distance between the end points of the line segment.
So here (a,b)=(-3,7)
and (c,d)=(0,4).
Hence distance between these two points is given by:
Answer:
26
Step-by-step explanation:
Since the input is -4, x = -4. The equation then is y = -7(-4) -2
A negative times a negative is a positive, so -7 times -4 is 28.
Now the equation reads y = 28 - 2
Then obviously you just subtract the two and then you get 26.
