Answer:
Attentional capture
Explanation:
In psychology, the term attentional capture refers to the unintentional focusing of attention. In other words, this phenomenon takes place when attention is involuntarily directed towards a new stimulus based on the characteristics of that second stimulus interrupting our previous focus of attention.
In this example, Janice is focused on her daughter's soccer game. Suddenly she notices a bright flash and loud boom that indicates a thunderstorm and she involuntarily shifts her attention to this flash and sound, we can see that <u>her attention was involuntarily directed towards the flash and sound because they were bright and loud, interrupting her attention on the game</u>. Thus, this is an example of attentional capture.
He was a key figure in uniting Canada.
<span>They supported the policies of his party (he was a conservative) </span>
<span>He was considered to be a good leader (or at least better than those who ran against him) ..</span>
Answer:
The slaves on board were suffering from some illness.
Explanation:
The narrator is afraid of ravage from the flux that i s the diarrheal infection.On june 27 the sick slave jumped.Since the narrator was afraid on June 22 of the ravage of the flux it gives us the hint that the slaves on board were suffering from some illness whether it is less or more.
The <span>Philippines
hope this helped! plz mark brainlest for me plz tysm </span>
Undoubtedly, there needs to be a certain degree of arms proliferation in all countries in order to secure their borders from external or internal threats. However, when the military budget of countries like the USA, the world´s largest power, is far greater than the budget destined to meet other needs of the State, these latter ones are unavoidably neglected, to the detriment of the country´s people. On the other hand, if a greater budget is destined to the building of infrastructure, history shows —like in Japan and Germany— that the economy becomes less dependent on warfare and relies more on human capital and culture.
The question then becomes whether economic gain through arms proliferation is more advantageous to the welfare of the people or if the wellbeing of the people —through the building of infrastructure— is more beneficial to any given government. Since the wellbeing of the people is, in principle —based on the International Bill of Human Rights—, the aim of all countries, these should be more preoccupied with the building of infrastructure.
