You have just committed an attributional bias called "the fundamental attribution error."
The fundamental attribution error is the inclination individuals need to overemphasize individual qualities and disregard situational factors in judging others' conduct. As a result of the fundamental attribution error, we have a tendency to trust that others do awful things since they are terrible individuals.
When contrasting life-course persistent offenders with adolescent-limited offenders, researchers agree that: the causes and consequences of the two are very different.
One of the strongest correlates of crime is age, with a common empirical finding of an adolescent rise and peak of offending. One theory in particular, Moffitt’s developmental taxonomy, advances a specific hypothesis for the age–crime relationship, with a focus on a specific typology of offenders, adolescence-limited who offend for specific reasons during adolescence. This chapter reviews the adolescence-limited hypothesis relevant empirical research, and concludes with summary statements, challenges to Moffitt’s adolescence-limited hypothesis, and directions for future research.
There are other theories that have been developed to explain the rise and peak of adolescent offending. Patterson (1997) set out a learning model in which decreases in parents monitoring and supervision during adolescence lead adolescents to offend. Another explanation is Agnew’s (2003) integrated theory of the adolescent peak in offending. Recalling that adolescents are given only some adult privileges and responsibilities, Agnew believes that this has important effects on increasing delinquency among adolescents, including a decline in supervision increased social and academic demands participation in a larger, more diverse peer-oriented social world an increase in the desire for adult privileges, and reduced ability to cope in a legitimate manner and an increase in the disposition to cope in an illegitimate (delinquency/crime) manner to attain the adult privileges and goods they want
Learn more about contrasting life-course persistent offenders
brainly.com/question/6258097
#SPJ4
Answer:
The best answer from the options given, to the question: How do polls affect presidential elections, would be: Polls identify the top candidates and the media interviews those candidates.
Explanation:
Polls are a means by which elections can be affected and swayed in favor of a candidate, a political party, or a group, because they tend to show the upward trends, which means, it will display, in a campaign, who is at the top in voters´ intention to vote, and thus, might sway other voters to choose either of those at the top. When a campaign takes place, especially for elections, researchers, and pollers, seek to help the public to make the better choice by finding out who is leading the intention of vote in voters. By doing this, polls may allow the public to know who has a chance of being elected, and thus sway support from the public to one, or another of those candidates. The media, of course, will focus their interviewing efforts on those who stand a chance of being elected. Which is why the answer is the one above.
Answer:
Inclusion
Explanation:
Inclusion is a situation where children Or students that have special needs spend a vast majority of their time with non special neef students.
Mariangela who has dyslexia being taught in the regular classroom, is an example of inclusion.
