Answer:
For this case the value of r = -0.66
Now we can calculate the determination coeffcient:

And then we can conclude that 43.56% of the variation in y can be explained by the explanatory variable
And then 100-43.56 = 56.44 % of the variation in y that cannot be explained by the explanatory variable
Step-by-step explanation:
For this case we need to calculate the slope with the following formula:
Where:
And we can find the intercept using this:
And the model obtained for this case is:

The correlation coefficient is a "statistical measure that calculates the strength of the relationship between the relative movements of two variables". It's denoted by r and its always between -1 and 1.
And in order to calculate the correlation coefficient we can use this formula:
For this case the value of r = -0.66
Now we can calculate the determination coeffcient:

And then we can conclude that 43.56% of the variation in y can be explained by the explanatory variable
And then 100-43.56 = 56.44 % of the variation in y that cannot be explained by the explanatory variable
9514 1404 393
Answer:
1. (256/3)π ft³
2. 33.49 ft³
Step-by-step explanation:
1. Put 4 ft into the formula where r is, then simplify.
V = (4/3)π(4 ft)³ = (256/3)π ft³
__
2. The radius is half the diameter, so is 2 ft. Put that in the formula, along with the value for π, and do the arithmetic.
V = (4/3)(3.14)(2 ft)³ ≈ 33.49 ft³
Answer:
The weight is 4 pounds :D
Step-by-step explanation: