1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
AVprozaik [17]
3 years ago
10

Classify each number according to which sets of numbers it belongs in:

Mathematics
1 answer:
True [87]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Natural, integer, rational:  10, 9, 3(12-\frac{2}{2})

Integer, rational:  -6

Rational:  3.7, 3.3333333

Irrational: \pi, 1.41421356

Step-by-step explanation:

Given numbers:

10,\pi, -6, 3.3333333333, 9, 3.7, 3(12-2/2),1.41421356

To classify them in natural integer, whole rational or irrational numbers.

Solution:

Natural numbers are whole numbers stating from 1.

{1,2,3,4,5,6..........}

Whole numbers are integers starting from 0.

{0,1,2,3,4,5...........}

Integers are all real numbers that do not include decimals or fractions.

{.............-4,-3,-2,-1,0,1,2,3,4.........}

Rational numbers are those numbers which can be represented as fraction of whole numbers. For example:

-1.5=-\frac{3}{2}

0.1111.....=\frac{1}{9}

5=\frac{5}{1}

Irrational numbers are those numbers which cannot be represented as simple fractions.

<em>Based on the above definitions, we can classify numbers.</em>

1) 10

Natural, Integer, Rational

2) \pi

Irrational

3) -6

Integer, Rational

4) 3.33333333333

Rational

5) 9

Natural, Integer, Rational

6) 3.7

Rational

7) 3(12-\frac{2}{2})=3(12-1)=3(11)=33

Natural, Integer, Rational

8) 1.41421356

Irrational

You might be interested in
Someone plzzz help this is due in 3 hours !!!
deff fn [24]

Answer:

hmmmmm

Step-by-step explanation:

yh about that, id just give up

5 0
3 years ago
Solve pls i give brainlist to correct answer.
DIA [1.3K]

Answer:

Maggie can run faster by 0.85 minutes.

Maggie runs in 5.20 minutes, Olivia runs in 4.35 minutes.

Step-by-step explanation:

Maggie = can run a mile in 5.2 minutes (1.3/0.25)

Olivia = can run a mile in 4.35 minutes (2.9/0.666666667)

5.2-4.35= 0.85 minutes

5 0
2 years ago
Fabian hikes at a rate of 3 miles per hour. how far can she home in for hours?
rjkz [21]

the answer is 12, 3x4=12

3 0
3 years ago
In the past, the population proportion of consumers preferring orange juice with no pulp was equation. To test if this populatio
geniusboy [140]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

We would set up the hypothesis test. This is a test of a single population mean since we are dealing with mean

a) For the null hypothesis,

P = 0.45

For the alternative hypothesis,

P ≠ 0.45

b) For the decision rule, we would reject H0 if 0.1 > p value and accepth H0 if 0.1 < p value

Considering the population proportion, probability of success, p = 0.45

q = probability of failure = 1 - p

q = 1 - 0.45 = 0.55

Considering the sample,

Sample proportion, p = x/n

Where

x = number of success = 52

n = number of samples = 120

p = 52/120 = 0.43

c) We would determine the test statistic which is the z score

z = (p - P)/√pq/n

z = (0.43 - 0.45)/√(0.45 × 0.55)/120 = - 0.44

Recall, population proportion, P = 0.45

The difference between sample proportion and population proportion(P - p) is 0.45 - 0.43 = 0.02

Since the curve is symmetrical and it is a two tailed test, the p for the left tail is 0.45 - 0.02 = 0.43

the p for the right tail is 0.45 + 0.02 = 0.47

These proportions are lower and higher than the null proportion. Thus, they are evidence in favour of the alternative hypothesis. We will look at the area in both tails. Since it is showing in one tail only, we would double the area

From the normal distribution table, the area below the test z score in the left tail 0.3336

We would double this area to include the area in the right tail of z = 0.44 Thus

p = 0.3336 × 2 = 0.67

d) Since alpha, 0.1 < than the p value, 0.67, then we would fail to reject the null hypothesis. Therefore, at a 1% level of significance, we do not have enough evidence to reject the​ null hypothesis

4 0
2 years ago
-4x+7 x= -1 evaluate the expression
NeX [460]
Hello luv! So here is how I will evaluate this expression
-4x+7, x=-1 so you are using substitution
-4(-1)+7
=11

:)

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the measure of CBE?<br>36°<br>72°<br>108°<br>144°<br>​
    13·2 answers
  • A tent in the shape of a triangle prism is made using the following piece of fabric.
    10·1 answer
  • What’s an angle bisector. Please explain.
    9·1 answer
  • Find the area of the shape shown below <br> 4<br> 2<br> 6<br> 2<br> 2<br> 2
    8·1 answer
  • YALLLL SOMEONE HELP A GIRL OUTTTT (ALSO NO LINKS I KNOW UR TRYING TO SCAM LOL)
    15·1 answer
  • What is the value of s ?
    7·1 answer
  • The consecutive angles of a rectangle are supplementary
    15·1 answer
  • If ° (3n-4)2 * = 310 then n= ?
    6·1 answer
  • HELP PLEASE DO NOT PUT A LINK
    13·1 answer
  • Provide the missing reasons for the proof. <br><br> Given: AB = CB<br> EB DB<br> Prove: ABC ~ EBD
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!