Porfirio Diaz served as the president of Mexico for a long 31 years and is considered to be a good and functional president.
Explanation:
The presidency of Porfirio Diaz was long and often saw many long phases of difficulty but was usually marked by a lot of poultice support that in a sense allowed him to hold on to power for so long.
Positive effects:
His economic policies ushered a form of new industrialization in the country.
He was a stable ruler and he led the country through some difficult crisis and wars.
Negative effects:
The President did away with the system of democracy for a long time and ruled unaided and uncollected for a long time.
he deteriorated relations with US which hurt the country in the long run.
B is the answer I did this yesterday
I believe the answer is C
Explanation:
Socrates and Meno both describe that at least virtue is the part of wisdom but we can not say that a most virtuous person is most beneficent only out of knowledge. This is the last point where Socrates and Meno failed to find virtue itself in considering such a virtuous person. This suggests puzzles Meno but Socrates explains that they have been looking for that virtue as a kind of teachable knowledge. The good deeds of virtuous men could equally be the result of not of the knowledge but the opinion.
Even Socrates gives the example of the guide on the road to the Larissa whether the guide has the knowledge and the true opinion about the way that results in the same
The first amendment would be the first question i’m pretty sure because it’s religious freedom and the right to free speech
