Because then there's no competitions for offices
A cultural system creates a unique world that is experienced as "reality" by its members. The people of a certain culture come to accept the "realities" which form its culture.
However, when groups of different cultures come together, their "realities" become confronted. Creating a clash of cultures. The outcome of this clash is decided by the material power of each of this groups. The group with the most material will emerge victoriously and end up influencing the other group with its cultural system. Therefore, individuals from the influenced culture will end up learning a new "reality" by force. On the other hand, individuals of the influencing culture tend to see the others as "objects of study".
Clashes of cultures have been occurring throughout time, affecting the cultural authenticity of groups. Due to the constant blend of cultures, it is nowadays, very difficult to consider that a certain cultural group is "truly authentic".
Being ethical is to have standards. If you are spontaneous you aren't really expecting anything you're acting purely on impulse. So I guess no.
The institutional resource in which <span> leaders both appointed by the president and approved by the Senate is: The Cabinet
The cabinet filled by the people that the president's trust themselves to handle specific aspects of their governmental plans. The senate, however, has the basis to accuse that a cabinet candidate is unsuited for the position and filibuster him/her.</span>
