Answer:
0.01 is the awnser can you put me as the brainlest awnser
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
a) (2x+7)(x-4)
b) x = -7/2 and x = 4
Step-by-step explanation:
a) (2x ?)(x ?)
set up the above and considered factors of 28 that, when paired with 2, would give me -1x and -28 → (1·28, 2·14, 4·7)
after trial-and-error, found that 4 and 7 worked (used un-FOIL)
b) 2x + 7 = 0
2x = -7
x = -7/2
*********
x-4 = 0
x = 4
Answer:
7 to 3 is this answer
Step-by-step explanation:
if you noticed, with all the other ones they all have 3 : 7 in it. So by the process of elimination it's 7 to 3 that is different. I'll tell you why,
3 : 7, that is the ratio we have as an example. That's why it isn't the different one.
3 to 7, you say 3 : 7 as 3 to 7 to it still has the same ratio
3/7, this is how to type the fraction version of the ratio so it makes sense that it is the same one as 3 : 7.
7 to 3, if you haven't noticed yet, all of them has 3 : 7 as a counterpart. They are all the same but this one, this is 7 : 3 or 7 to 3. So with logic, this is the different ratio.
Answer:
28 and 29
Step-by-step explanation:
28x29=812
28+29=57
