The answer would be A. Shoes.
It is implied that a good has an inelastic supply if the supplier does not have a choice other than producing it despite the change in production cost. This would as well apply to the buyer, who needs the product no matter the pricing.No one can live without shoes, despite a spike in prices, we still need to buy them.
<span>The company could consider diversifying when sales are beginning to slow and there is a way to leverage some of the business's core competencies in other areas that would be more competitive. In addition, this could allow the business to not worry about being "all-in" in a certain area, where that area's success or failure could lead to the entire business thriving or failing. By diversifying itself, the business can also lower production and sales costs or increase overall sales.</span>
The better the IRR, the better. but, a corporation may additionally decide on a mission with a decreased IRR as it has other intangible advantages, together with contributing to a larger strategic plan or impeding competition.
Solution:
NPV of Project S= -$1,000 +$895.03/(1+10.5%) + $250//(1+10.5%)^2 +$10//(1+10.5%)^3 +$5//(1+10.5%)^4 =25.49320776
IRR of Project S= -$1,000 +$895.03/(1+r%) + $250//(1+r%)^2 +$10//(1+r%)^3 +$5//(1+r%)^4 =0
IRR =12.80%
NPV of Project L = -$1,000+ $5/(1+10.5%) +$260/(1+10.5%)^2 + $420/(1+10.5%)^3 + $802.50/(1+10.5%)^4
=$67.01
IRR of Project L=
-$1,000+ $5/(1+r%) +$260/(1+r%)^2 + $420/(1+r%)^3 + $802.50/(1+r%)^4 =0
IRR =12.700%
Project L is better than Project S since L has higher NPV
IRR of Project L is 12.7%.
Learn more about IRR here:-brainly.com/question/28428807
#SPJ4
Answer:
facing the speaker and maintaining eye contact