1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kakasveta [241]
3 years ago
6

Who was the native American chief that served as a British Army officer during the revolutionary war

Social Studies
1 answer:
zhuklara [117]3 years ago
4 0
Joseph Brant was the Native American chief that served as a British army officer during the Revolutionary War
You might be interested in
Who was Montezuma? <br><br>Answer need ASAP!!!
Lelechka [254]
Moctezuma II, variant spellings include Montezuma, Moteuczoma, Motecuhzoma, Motēuczōmah, Muteczuma, and referred to in full by early Nahuatl texts as Motecuhzoma Xocoyotzin, was the ninth tlatoani or ruler of Tenochtitlan, reigning from 1502 to 1520. The ninth ruler of the Aztec empire, Montezuma II (1466-1520) was seized by the Spanish conquistadores, who used him to control and rule the empire. Montezuma was born in Tenochtitlán, capital of the Aztec empire, and the present site of Mexico City.
6 0
3 years ago
The _____ of the house of representatives is elected by the majority-party caucus to act as spokesperson for the party and to ke
fiasKO [112]
The Speaker of the House is elected by the majority party. 
7 0
3 years ago
Maria has two e-mail accounts, two cell phone numbers, and two social media accounts. One set of accounts she uses just for comm
Alex Ar [27]

Answer: front and back region

Explanation:

When we are dealing with our employer or other professional businesses we have to act different than we normal act , we bring up a different self so we put in a front region.

We have to be this person who is strict , calm , professional at all times when we are dealing with our professional team.

We change the language we speak , the pictures we post on our social network ; everything has to show moral and good ethics because we don't want to risk creating an unprofessional image to our employer or business partners .

However with friends and family we can be as casual as we want to be even the langauge we use , the photos we post on our social network , we can be our normal self without any fear hence we can be in our back region.

5 0
3 years ago
At some point, it will occur to you that there is this oddity in the argument: most people living in a civil society never actua
Dominik [7]

There is no objective answer to this question, as both sides have arguments that support their views.

If you believe that you are bound by Hobbes' argument, it is because of tacit consent. Tacit consent means that, even though you have not explicitly agreed to follow laws, you have indicated your agreement through other means, for example, by using the public services of the government or by remaining within the limits of your country. Also, you could argue that any rational person would prefer to follow the rules of the government than to live in the state of nature. Therefore, if you are rational, your consent is assumed. Finally, you could also argue that while you did not explicitly agreed, maybe your ancestors did, which still binds you as a member of the same society.

On the other hand, if you believe that you are not bound by Hobbes' argument, you could argue that any contract that is not freely agreed upon is not valid. As the government uses force to make you act according to the law, you cannot be considered to be freely consenting. Also, you can argue that agreeing to follow some rules does not imply following <em>all</em> of the laws of the country. Finally, a common argument against Hobbes is the lack of empirical data. As we do not know if the state of nature is actually bad, or if the contract ever happened, the government cannot gain its legitimacy in that way.

3 0
3 years ago
"We Communists have been reproached with the desire of abolishing the right of personally acquiring property as the fruit of a
cupoosta [38]

Answer: C. The wealthy upper-middle class.

Explanation:

The Communist Manifesto is a political treatise written by Karl Marx and Frederick Engels and published in 1848. This treatise explains what Marxism is, and what material good implies from this economic perspective.

According to this treaty, the bourgeoisie is the wealthy upper-middle-class, they are generally the owners of property, companies, and industry. Through the communist treaty, the bourgeoisie is accused of preventing the free development of the working class, contrary to what communism wants to do by giving everyone an equal opportunity to be free.

<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What were the names of three of the early inhabitants of Latin America
    15·1 answer
  • What is the wheel and what was it used for
    15·1 answer
  • if the flame of a bunsen burner should accidnentally go out a student should immediately run over to the teacher and inform him/
    14·1 answer
  • So even now i continue this investigation as the god bade me﹘and i go around seeking out anyone, citizen or stranger, whom i thi
    14·1 answer
  • Which scenario best describes an initiative?
    8·2 answers
  • Explain why the government imposes price floors and price ceilings in certain markets.
    5·1 answer
  • The​ ________ strategy is built on the​ win-win philosophy, empathy and ego​ drive, and character and integrity.
    7·1 answer
  • In The Feminine Mystique, Betty Friedan argued that women who spent their lives as mothers and homemakers were generally satisfi
    11·1 answer
  • HELP
    14·2 answers
  • I need this answers asap!! :)
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!