Dear Editor,
I want to draw your attention towards the key strengths that the patriots have which may, according to me, lead them to a victory in war of independence.
The first important thing to consider is the war strategy that the patriots and the British have adopted. I understand the patriots have neither a naval power nor a specialized army. However, the strength here is the suffering of the desertion rates by the army which, I think, will pretty much pay them back positively.
Secondly, the deployment of the famous Fabian Strategy by Gen. Washington will yield fruitful results for the patriots. This is because it directly targets the Hudson Highland Strategy of the British without necessarily involving in conventional battle.
Thirdly, I think the alliance with France is of paramount importance here; Morgan successfully managed to lure Cornwallis in after the Battle of Cowpens in the year 1781. Due to all of these key strengths, I believe the patriots will win the war of independence.
Regards,
XYZ.
Answer:
the correct option is: A) the industry continued to grow throughout the country at a surprising rate after the end of the war, with an increase in employment
Explanation:
South Carolina continued its industrialization during the decades that followed World War II. Few US states today are as dependent on industry as South Carolina. This growth has continued since the 1980s, mainly because of tax incentives for companies, as well as the increased attention given by the state to education..
Answer: Tractor --> capital
removing minerals from underground ---> labor
forest---> land
Explanation:
ur welcome :)
Answer: Many as ten% percent of women in the Northeast were involved in reformed groups
PS. You Tube Subscribe to Jah Nation
Both sophists and philosophers were well trained and highly educated, but the main difference was that a sophist taught others and they got paid for that. It is said that their own wealth was their only goal.
Philosophers, such as Socrates, refused to get paid.
Throughout history, the sophists have had a reputation as professionally amoral, . They would help people to attain any goal, regardless of what it was. They would take any case, promote any cause, and empower any person, if the money was right.
Philosophers, for the most part, have walked on the side of the angels. They may sometimes have had reputations as prolix and obscure, complex and abstract, out of touch, but they have, for the most part, seemed to be purer souls in their focus and work.
In other words, the sophists were much more concerned about how than about why. The philosophers have always been more cautious.
