Knowing the volume of a 3-D shape is extremely when deciding what materials to use and how much of them to use. When you know the volume of the different designs is helpful when deciding which material costs less to use but still meets requirements. For example, if you were trying to decide what material to fill your product with, and say the volume of your product is 36^3. You narrow things down to two products, one costing $54 to fill the entire thing. The other costing $60. Because you have the volume, it will be easy to decide which is better based off of the price per square inch. If you didn't have the volume. You would have to make an estimate and potentially make a bad business decision.
Hope this helps! I apologize for my long response
Answer:
the correct answer is D
Step-by-step explanation:
because the -9 5/8 is in absolute value marks.
<em>Answer:</em>
Complete proof is written below.
Facts and explanation about the segments shown in question :
- As BC = EF is a given statement in the question
- AB + BC = AC because the definition of betweenness gives us a clear idea that if a point B is between points A and C, then the length of AB and the length of BC is equal to the length of AC. Also according to Segment addition postulate, AB + BC = AC. For example, if AB = 5 and BC= 7 then AC = AB + BC → AC = 12
- AC > BC because the Parts Theorem (Segments) mentions that if B is a point on AC between A and C, then AC > BC and AC>AB. So, if we observe the question figure, we can realize that point B lies on the segment AC between points A and C.
- AC > EF because BC is equal to EF and if AC>BC, then it must be true that the length of AC must greater than the length segment EF.
Below is the complete proof of the observation given in the question:
<em />
<em>STATEMENT REASON </em>
___________________________________________________
1. BC = EF 1. Given
2. AB + BC = AC 2. Betweenness
3. AC > BC 3. Def. of segment inequality
4. AC > EF 4. Def. of congruent segments
<em />
<em>Keywords: statement, length, reason, proof</em>
<em>
Learn more about proof from brainly.com/question/13005321</em>
<em>
#learnwithBrainly</em>
No, because element b has 2 correspondents.
