Answer:
The main difference of them is that <u><em>the programmed decisions faced repetitive problems when the other does not</em></u>.
Explanation:
On one hand, the programeed decisions are those that involve repetitive scenarios with problems that already happended once, therefore that the person that takes these kind of decisions does not need to prepare a new method or technique in order to face the problem, instead that person just need to follow a method that was previous designed for that type of situation.
On the other hand, the nonprogrammed decisions are those complete opposite to the programmed decisions, that comprehends that those type are commonly used in the decision making process when dealing with a new problem that has never occured before and therefore that it needs planning and structuring of a new method to solutionate the problem.
To sum up, the implications that those differences, allegated before, do to the decision maker is that <em><u>in the programmed decisions the person who takes the decision does not need to plan</u></em> or structure any new method to face the problem, meanwhile <u><em>in the nonprogrammed decisions the person does obligatorily need to structure a method to resolve the problem</em></u>.
Answer:
a. To terminate the lease, then seek damages or rent adjustment.
Explanation:
when a landlord breaches his/her duties, the tenant has three available remedies:
- termination
- damages
- rent adjustment
Generally when things like this happen, the tenant will terminate the contract and in order to do so must leave the premises and notify the landlord that he/she is doing so and the reasons why. Then the tenant can seek compensation for damages caused by the landlord's breach of duties. Damages are generally limited to relocation costs, e.g. costs of finding a new apartment and moving there.
If Aston decided to stay at the apartment, he could seek to fix the plumbing issues and seek compensation from the landlord.
Out of the possible options, option a is correct.
The answer to the question above is option C: they can result in a channel member having too much control. Firstly, we define what vertical system is. From the term itself vertical, the formation of the members is from top to bottom. Therefore, this includes the <span>producer, wholesaler, and retailer and this is where the distribution channel occurs. The reason why this kind of system is a business ethic issue is due to channel members that might have too much control because of their positions and unequal distribution of tasks. </span>
A. An income of 25,000 annually is not enough to sustain a household and creditors would be hesitant to loan money to someone without resources to easily repay it.