Answer: This is FALSE
Explanation: In today's world, where technology has made it more easier to pass out information to people, it will be very difficult for a particular tribe to be in leadership for long where another tribes are there. This will cause agitation among tribes and violence among the people.
The introduction of democracy by many nation's, has made it easier for people to select the one to lead them, and if this person has not lead with uttermost deligency to service, he or she will be removed during the next election.
Though it may be true for one tribe to hold on to leadership position for long. This only happens to a place where the people living in such territory are tribal, the majority tribe will always vote for a candidate from their tribe to lead, this will always make the voting to be bias based on tribe.
Placing regulations on factories and industries | I don’t know if I’m right though
<span>A) People questioned long-accepted views.
This is the correct answer because after the scientific revolution, experimenting and testing scientific hypotheses became easier to conduct. With an improvement in laboratory resources and knowledge, long-accepted views can be tested before they are verified and accepted as scientifically true. </span><span>
</span>
Answer: we need to stop a lot o' things
Explanation:
because we humans lives are meaningful, it does not mean we can't be meaningful to God by praying and such...
It should be noted that the people who argue that justices should be willing to overturn laws are known to be supporting judicial activism.
Judicial activism simply refers to the practice in the judiciary of protecting the individual rights of an individual through the decisions that depart from the precedents that are already established.
It's about the willingness of a judge to be able to strike down another governmental branch or overturn a judicial precedent. They enforce their own views regarding constitutional requirements.
Learn more about justice on:
brainly.com/question/25756666