Answer:
The parents are using punishment to suppress the screaming; their use of punishment is negatively reinforced by the cessation of screaming.
Explanation:
Punishment: In psychology, the term "punishment" is determined as one of the concepts of operant conditioning which was proposed by B. F. Skinner. Punishment referred to any specific changes in an organism's (human beings & animals) environmental surrounding that tends to occur only when a particular response or behavior is being provided and generally reduces the response or behavior to occur again in the future.
Punishment is of two types i.e, negative and positive punishment.
In the question above, the given statement represents the negative punishment (decreases an unwanted behavior by removing a desired thing).
B because it’s only one person
This illustrates "inattentional blindness".
Inattentional blindness which is otherwise called perceptual blindness is a mental absence of consideration that isn't related with any vision deformities or shortages. It might be additionally characterized as the occasion in which an individual neglects to see an unexpected stimulus that is on display. Inattentional blindness basically implies that you miss something directly before you.
Russian Roulette is a game where 2 or more people sit at a table and they spin a revolver with only one bullet in the chamber who ever the barrel of the gun points at takes the gun, spins the chamber, points it at there head and pulls the trigger if the don't die they then don't get shot they repeat this process till someone gets shot who ever lives wins obviously
Answer:
1
The action of Pfizer is no way near an ethical act and was a clear violation of the ethical standards.This is true because
- As it is the company responsibility to act ethically to achieve the goals of the society by eradicating their problems and not by enhancing them hence the corporate social responsibility would not allow the company to behave inhumanly
- The duty based ethics would also empower the corporation to care and respect humanity
- Its is highly unethical on the part of Pfizer to conduct test on human life.if we consider the six basic guidelines to make ethical decisions then they have done it in a highly unethical manner.The six basic guidelines would never allow any company to behave i such a manner so as to risk the human life
Pfizer did not obey any of the above ethical standards and the conduct was clear violation of ethical standard.
2
Pfizer plc is not guilty of any ethical standard violation as it is a common practice for drug manufacturer to conduct tests on animals as well as human.And anyways the company conducted the tests on those human beings who will die with the epidermic which has already invaded the entire country of Nigeria.Hence in other to save/protect a large number of human being the test on the few persons is ethical as it is done to protect the society at large
So we cannot say that the company had violated any ethical standard
3
In order for Pfizer to avert the consequences of the violation then Pfizer should use the following five steps to create solution tom problem on ethical question these steps include
- Inquiry : It is very crucial to make initial inquiry about the entire subject matter
- Discussion: If there is a list of action generated after inquiry then discussion on every single action should be made
- Decision : It is highly crucial to take any decision with the consensus of all the participating candidates
- Justification : Each decision made must have a justification for the entire process
- Evaluation : it is highly crucial to evaluate the entire process
Explanation: