1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
son4ous [18]
3 years ago
7

Assume that the plaintiff was 60 percent responsible for his own injuries. He would be able to recover the 40 percent of his inj

uries caused by the negligent defendant if the state that hears the case follows the doctrine of _________ negligence.a. Contributory b. Modified comparative faultc. Pure comparative fault d. Situs
Business
1 answer:
ivolga24 [154]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The correct answer is the option C: Pure comparative fault.

Explanation:

To begin with, Comparative Negligence is an approach of the Contributory Negligence that is adopted nowadays by most of the states and that focuses in the amount of fault of each party when it comes to determines who's negligence was the one that caused the injuries. Moreover, this type of approach has two other more different approaches, that are pure comparative and modified comparative.

To continue,<em> ''</em><u><em>pure comparative negligence''</em></u> allows parties to collect for damages even when they are more than 50 percent responsible for the injury, however the amount of damages is limited by the party's actual degree of fault. Meanwhile the modifed comparative negligence only recognizes the recover of the damages when they are less than the 50 percent responsible of the injury. That is why if the state that hears the case follows the doctrine of the pure comparative negligence then the plaintiff will be able to recover the 40 percent of the injuries by the negligent defendant, even thought if he was 60 percent responsible.

You might be interested in
Assume the world market for oil is competitive and that the marginal cost of producing​ (extracting and bringing to​ market) ano
xz_007 [3.2K]

Answer:

The economic surplus will decrease by $2.20

Explanation:

$81.40 and $79.20 are <em>marginal </em>cost and benefit, which are the changes to total costs and total benefits due to producing and consuming one additional barrel of oil.

They can be used to calculate <em>change </em>to economic surplus, which is the change to the net economic value received by society, which is given by:

marginal benefit - marginal cost = $79.20 - $81.40 = - $2.20

7 0
3 years ago
Barney decides to quit his job as a corporate accountant, which pays $10,000 a month, and goes into business for himself as a ce
Yuliya22 [10]

Answer:

A. $125

(Supplies + Electricity)

B. $10,300

(Salary lost + Rent amount lost)

C. $10,425

(Add them together)

4 0
3 years ago
A german firm raising capital by selling stock through the london stock exchange is an example of _____.
antiseptic1488 [7]
<span>A german firm raising capital by selling stock through the london stock exchange is an example of transnational financing.

Transnational financing occurs when a firm goes to another country to raise capital through the issue of stocks and bonds.
</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Where in a business plan should the executive summary go?
8_murik_8 [283]

Answer:

The executive summary goes near the beginning of the plan but is written last

6 0
3 years ago
Problems and applications q6 darnell loves playing rock 'n' roll music at high volume. jacques loves opera and hates rock 'n' ro
mafiozo [28]

Answer:

false

Explanation:

The Coase theorem states that parties in dispute should seek an optimal solution to their problem regardless of how property rights were initially distributed.

In this case, you need to find an agreement that satisfies both Darnell and Jacques regardless of who initially would have been considered to be right about the argument. Conflicts over rights to use property can be solved when parties settle on the efficient use of inputs. E.g. they could establish hours at which Darnell can listen to rock n' roll, and other hours when he shouldn't. That way both of them can enjoy the music they like and not bother the neighbors.

An optimal solution can always be reached regardless of initial distribution of rights.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which action is the best example of appropriate e-mail use at work?
    8·1 answer
  • A marketer makes a place decision by selecting channels of distribution. what does this mean?
    9·1 answer
  • Gerry, one of your subordinates, seems to care so much about being liked that he rarely states strong opinions in meetings of yo
    12·1 answer
  • 1. Cost-volume-profit analysis assumes all of the following EXCEPT:
    5·1 answer
  • If an agreement can not be made, a democratic leader will
    8·1 answer
  • What is more important: everyone doing their part or the leader doing it all? Why? (Take your time)
    13·1 answer
  • Famous Foods is a fast-food chain restaurant famous for its hot coffee (its coffee temperature is a bit higher than that of the
    14·1 answer
  • Why, in summary, should managers think of staffing, training, appraising, and paying employees as a talent management process?
    6·1 answer
  • Mopsun, a garment store, sells customized hoodies at $7 per unit. The total fixed costs add up to $8,000 per year, and the varia
    7·1 answer
  • A woman decided to have a painting done of herself. She contracted in writing with an artist, who agreed to paint the woman for
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!