Answer:
Total unitary cost= $4,800
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Actual units= 800
Total fixed costs= 1,000*800= 800,000
UNitary variable cost= $4,000
Units increase= 200
<u>On unitary bases, variable costs remain constant. On the contrary, fixed costs vary at a unitary level. Now, the same amount of costs is divided by a larger number of units.</u>
<u></u>
Unitary fixed overhead= 800,000/1,000= $800
Total unitary cost= 4,000 + 800= $4,800
Everything but the twizlers I don’t like them lol sorry -
Answer:
The Journal entries are as follows:
(i) Sales revenue A/c Dr. $900
To Cash $900
(To record the correction in sales revenue)
(ii) Merchandise Inventory A/c Dr. $200
To Cost of Goods sold $200
(To record the merchandise returned)
Note:
(1) At the time of sale, the cash would have been debited with the amount of $900 and the sales revenue would have been credited with the amount of $900. Now, the cash of $900 should be credited as it was debited earlier.
(2) The inventory account also credited at the time sale, so it should be debited and the cost of goods sold debited at the time of original sale, so it need to be credited.
Answer:
Explanation:
This is an annuity question. Use present value of annuity formula to solve this;
You can use a financial calculator to solve it. I'm using "Texas instrument BA II plus" calculator
<em>(Note: if using the same calculator as above ,enter the numbers first, then each respective function )</em>
N ; duration on investment = 20
I/Y; interest rate per year = 12%
PV; Present value = -2,000,000
FV; Future value = 0 (in annuities, use 0 if not given)
then CPT PMT = 267,757.56
Therefore, Stephanie will be able to withdraw $267,757.56
Answer:
A per se violation
Explanation:
A per se violation is one that violates antitrust laws for example agreements made that violates the Sherman antitrust act. It has adverse effects on the competitiveness of a market.
Sherman antitrust act of 1980 is aimed at regulating competitiveness in a market. It prohibits anticompetitive agreements, and unilateral activities that tries to monopolize a market.
In this scenario Omega corporation and precision products, inc., are the principal suppliers of their product in their market. They make an agreement that one will focus on retailers and the other on wholesalers.
This is an attempt to monopolize the market by the two principal suppliers, and is a violation of the Sherman antitrust act.
