Answer:
amigo no hablo español pero si me mandas la tarea en español con gusto te ayudaría ok
In Palko v. Connecticut (1937), the Supreme Court had to decide whether "due process of law" means states must obey the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The observation of the Supreme Court is that the convict cannot be punished two times for the same offense. It is simple and very clear that the convict cannot be punished under the fourth and fifth amendments for same offense.
In this particular case, the prosecution has charged Frank Palko for first-degree murder and the court has given a decree as life imprisonment. But the actual nature crime amounts to second-degree murder.
So, the state of Connecticut appealed against this judgment and it has been proved that offense made by Frank Palko amounts to second-degree murder and the death penalty is awarded to convict. The Supreme Court's main decision in Palko vs Connecticut was Palko was the victim of unconstitutional double jeopardy.
The argument that might be used by someone who supports strict campaign finance laws is that Corporations and labor unions that have too much power.
Financial law is defined as the law and standard or regulation of the derivatives, insurance, commercial banking, investment management sectors, and capital markets.
The people that support the strict campaign finance laws are the companies or corporations and the labor unions because they have a too much power in the finance laws.
learn more about the finance laws here
brainly.com/question/515053
#SPJ4
Answer:Cruel and unusual
Explanation: Punishment is a term used to describe the process through which physical and psychological actions are taken against criminals and offenders in order to correct the abnormalities associated with their actions.
PURNISHNMENT SHOULD BE A CORRECTIVE SET OF ACTIONS AND NOT DESTRUCTIVE, IT SHOULD NOT BE DONE IN SUCH A WAY TO DESTROY THE DIGNITY, CIVILIZED STANDARDS, HUMANITY, AND DECENCY OF THE PERSON.
