There is no figure below.
Answer:
Option 2
Step-by-step explanation:
We know that the graph will face down (the negative sign)
We also know that the vertex should be (-2, 1)
Therefore, option 2 is the solution
Answer:
The steps 1-7 have been explained
Step-by-step explanation:
The steps are;
1) We will verify that the population standard deviations are known and that the population is normally distributed which means the sample size must be a minimum of 30.
2) We will state the null and alternative hypothesis
3) We will determine the critical values from the relevant tables
4) From the critical values gotten, we will determine it's corresponding region where it can be rejected.
5)We will calculate the value of the test statistic from the formula;
z = [(x1' - x2') - (μ1 - μ2)]/√[((σ1)²/n1) + ((σ2)²/n2)]
6) If the value of the test statistic gotten from step 5 above falls in the region of rejection noted in step 4,then we will reject the null hypothesis
7) After rejection of the null hypothesis, we will now give a decision/conclusion on the claim.
Answer:
The bigger avocado will be a better deal if the ratio of the sizes of the bigger one to the smaller one is less than the ratio of the prices of the bigger one to the smaller one.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that two sizea of avocados are being sold, since the regular size is being sold for $0.84 each, let the price for the bigger avocado be $x.
Then note the following:
1. How bigger than the smaller avocado is the bigger one?
This would determine if the price for the bigger one is a bargain, or a mistake.
If for instance, the bigger avocado is double the size of the smaller one, then for any price, $x less that $1.68 (twice of $0.84), it is a bargain.
The bigger avocado will be a better deal if the ratio of the sizes bigger one to the smaller one is less than the ratio of the prices of the bigger one to the smaller one.
The opposite sides are supplementary
43+x=180
X=137
