The answer is: <span>child safety seat
Young children have a weaker and more fragile bone structure compared to the adults. This makes a small impact during small collisions could be really dangerous to their life.
To prevent such unwanted events from happening, the states requires child safety seat as a protection and so the parents could monitor their children from driving position</span>
The Supreme court maintained a precise separation of state power and national power
I have the following problem with options a), b) and d): they don't specify the kind of values or philosophy that the adults have - so they would apply also tho problematic values, such as racism.
Therefore I don't think that they're beneficial to children, at least without having more information. Therefore the best answer is d) realistic expectations.
Protective covering and camouflage
<span>The statement is "False".</span><span>
It actually is referring to the act of Secondary Oppression. </span>Tertiary
oppression is executed by individuals from a
persecuted gather when they look for acknowledgment by supporting the
predominant party's onerous demonstrations. For instance a minority-group member
may oppress kindred group individuals to get support with prevailing group
individuals.
