2nd option. Settlers could purchase title to farmlands in the west.
It highlighted the sectional issues that divided the nation.
It put an end to the debate over states' rights.
The “nullification crisis” challenged the federal government's right to impose its own laws. A war was imminent.
These tariffs had been established to protect factories in the northern states against foreign competition. Southern farmers thought this was unfair.
Andrew Jackson, the president of the United States, issued a proclamation in which he warned that South Carolina's rejection of federal tariffs was an act of rebellion that could end in bloodshed. South Carolina responded promptly in preparation for war.
Answer:
Yes, they could have but it would have been very difficult.
Explanation:
The reason is that the attitudes of the leaders of Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan (Hitler, and Hirohito, respectively) were very pro-war. Both leaders were pursuing an aggressive expansionary policy, whcih means that they wanted to conquer a lot of new land in order to be colonized by German or Japanese people respectively.
However, some of the policies of the British, French, and American government could have been different. For example, the could have been harder on Hitler at first, when he was pursuing the annexation of Austria, and Czechia.
